Literature DB >> 11595264

The effect of encoding strategy on the neural correlates of memory for faces.

Lori J Bernstein1, Sania Beig, Amy L Siegenthaler, Cheryl L Grady.   

Abstract

Encoding and recognition of unfamiliar faces in young adults were examined using positron emission tomography to determine whether different encoding strategies would lead to encoding/retrieval differences in brain activity. Three types of encoding were compared: a 'deep' task (judging pleasantness/unpleasantness), a 'shallow' task (judging right/left orientation), and an intentional learning task in which subjects were instructed to learn the faces for a subsequent memory test but were not provided with a specific strategy. Memory for all faces was tested with an old/new recognition test. A modest behavioral effect was obtained, with deeply-encoded faces being recognized more accurately than shallowly-encoded or intentionally-learned faces. Regardless of encoding strategy, encoding activated a primarily ventral system including bilateral temporal and fusiform regions and left prefrontal cortices, whereas recognition activated a primarily dorsal set of regions including right prefrontal and parietal areas. Within encoding, the type of strategy produced different brain activity patterns, with deep encoding being characterized by left amygdala and left anterior cingulate activation. There was no effect of encoding strategy on brain activity during the recognition conditions. Posterior fusiform gyrus activation was related to better recognition accuracy in those conditions encouraging perceptual strategies, whereas activity in left frontal and temporal areas correlated with better performance during the 'deep' condition. Results highlight three important aspects of face memory: (1) the effect of encoding strategy was seen only at encoding and not at recognition; (2) left inferior prefrontal cortex was engaged during encoding of faces regardless of strategy; and (3) differential activity in fusiform gyrus was found, suggesting that activity in this area is not only a result of automatic face processing but is modulated by controlled processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11595264     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00070-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

1.  fMRI differences in encoding and retrieval of pictures due to encoding strategy in the elderly.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mandzia; Sandra E Black; Mary Pat McAndrews; Cheryl Grady; Simon Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Processing faces and facial expressions.

Authors:  Mette T Posamentier; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Temporally graded activation of neocortical regions in response to memories of different ages.

Authors:  John L Woodard; Michael Seidenberg; Kristy A Nielson; Sarah K Miller; Malgorzata Franczak; Piero Antuono; Kelli L Douville; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Remembering the Details: Effects of Emotion.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Emot Rev       Date:  2009

5.  Effects of aging on the neural correlates of successful item and source memory encoding.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Scott M Hayes; Steven E Prince; David J Madden; Scott A Huettel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The "visual word form area" is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces.

Authors:  Leilei Mei; Gui Xue; Chuansheng Chen; Feng Xue; Mingxia Zhang; Qi Dong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The path to memory is guided by strategy: distinct networks are engaged in associative encoding under visual and verbal strategy and influence memory performance in healthy and impaired individuals.

Authors:  Jena B Hales; James B Brewer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Cytology and functionally correlated circuits of human posterior cingulate areas.

Authors:  Brent A Vogt; Leslie Vogt; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Adolescents with and without gestational cocaine exposure: Longitudinal analysis of inhibitory control, memory and receptive language.

Authors:  Laura M Betancourt; Wei Yang; Nancy L Brodsky; Paul R Gallagher; Elsa K Malmud; Joan M Giannetta; Martha J Farah; Hallam Hurt
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.763

10.  The Role of Visual Association Cortex in Associative Memory Formation across Development.

Authors:  Maya L Rosen; Margaret A Sheridan; Kelly A Sambrook; Matthew R Peverill; Andrew N Meltzoff; Katie A McLaughlin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.