Literature DB >> 11593205

Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular volume: correlation with magnetic resonance imaging--a validation study.

D Lee1, A R Fuisz, P H Fan, T L Hsu, C P Liu, H T Chiang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to validate the ability of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3D) to measure cardiac volume.
METHODS: We studied 25 patients with various cardiac disorders who had a regular heart rhythm and a good precordial echocardiographic window. Each patient underwent complete transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), RT3D, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Left ventricular dimension was calculated from slices of the whole left ventricle obtained by 7 different equidistant azimuth tilts. Planimetry of the endocardial (for volume data) and epicardium (for mass data) surface was performed for each azimuth tilt. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) were calculated. The cardiac mass data were derived with the formula (Epicardial volume - LVEDV) x 1.055. The parameters of LVEDV, LVESV, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac mass were compared with those derived from MRI.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the data from RT3D and MRI (P > or =.05). Good correlations were found between these two methods for left ventricle volume and mass measurements (r from 0.92 to 0.99). However, a weaker correlation was found with larger chamber sizes because extrapolation was necessary for the volume of myocardial segments that were not covered by the small sector angle.
CONCLUSIONS: For data acquisition, RT3D is faster than either TTE or MRI. It is also better than MRI for measuring cardiac volume and mass. To improve results with larger cardiac chamber sizes, enlargement of the sector angle will be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11593205     DOI: 10.1067/mje.2001.113647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  10 in total

1.  Noninvasive modalities for the assessment of left ventricular function: all are equal but some are more equal than others.

Authors:  Tiong Keng Lim; Roxy Senior
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Contrast-enhanced versus non-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography of left ventricular volumes.

Authors:  J A van der Heide; H F J Mannaerts; L Yang; G T Sieswerda; C A Visser; O Kamp
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 3.  Left ventricular function assessment in cirrhosis: Current methods and future directions.

Authors:  Francisco Sampaio; Joana Pimenta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Accuracy of three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with prior anteroseptal myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Maruyama; Kentaro Toyama; Shunichi Sato; Nobuyuki Masaki; Masato Kirimura; Nobuo Yoshimoto
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-01-14

Review 5.  Structural and Functional Phenotyping of the Failing Heart: Is the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Obsolete?

Authors:  Michael R Bristow; David P Kao; Khadijah K Breathett; Natasha L Altman; John Gorcsan; Edward A Gill; Brian D Lowes; Edward M Gilbert; Robert A Quaife; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 12.035

6.  Comparison of echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of functional single ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction (from the Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study).

Authors:  Renee Margossian; Marcy L Schwartz; Ashwin Prakash; Lisa Wruck; Steven D Colan; Andrew M Atz; Timothy J Bradley; Mark A Fogel; Lynne M Hurwitz; Edward Marcus; Andrew J Powell; Beth F Printz; Michael D Puchalski; Jack Rychik; Girish Shirali; Richard Williams; Shi-Joon Yoo; Tal Geva
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Comparison of contrast enhanced three dimensional echocardiography with MIBI gated SPECT for the evaluation of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Bernard Cosyns; David Haberman; Steven Droogmans; Sandrine Warzée; Philippe Mahieu; Eric Laurent; Marie Moonen; Sophie Hernot; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 8.  Assessment of left ventricular function by three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Boudewijn J Krenning; Marco M Voormolen; Jos R T C Roelandt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  The impact of preload on 3-dimensional deformation parameters: principal strain, twist and torsion.

Authors:  Hyo-Suk Ahn; Yong-Kyun Kim; Ho Chul Song; Euy Jin Choi; Gee-Hee Kim; Jung Sun Cho; Sang-Hyun Ihm; Hee-Yeol Kim; Chan Seok Park; Ho-Joong Youn
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 10.  3D and 4D Ultrasound: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Susan H Kwon; Aasha S Gopal
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2017-11-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.