Literature DB >> 11592765

Adult height and risk of breast cancer: a possible effect of early nutrition.

T I Nilsen1, L J Vatten.   

Abstract

The relationship of breast cancer to early reproductive development and height suggests that fetal and childhood nutrition may be important in its aetiology. Caloric restriction sufficient to reduce adult height may reduce breast cancer risk. During World War II (WWII) there was a marked reduction in average caloric intake in Norway that resulted in greater nutritional diversity. We hypothesized that a positive association between height and risk of breast cancer would be stronger among women who were born during this period than among women born before or after the war. A total of 25 204 Norwegian women were followed up for approximately 11 years, and 215 incident cases of breast cancer were registered. We found the strongest positive association between height and breast cancer among women born during WWII: women in the tallest tertile (>167 cm) had a relative risk of 2.5 (95% confidence interval = 1.2-5.5) compared with the shortest (< or = 162 cm). Among women born before or after the war we found no clear association with height. The association with height in the WWII cohort may imply a role for early nutrition in breast cancer aetiology. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11592765      PMCID: PMC2375102          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  23 in total

1.  Cancer and insulin-like growth factor-I. A potential mechanism linking the environment with cancer risk.

Authors:  G D Smith; D Gunnell; J Holly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

2.  Height and weight in relation to breast cancer morbidity and mortality. A prospective study of 570,000 women in Norway.

Authors:  S Tretli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Breast cancer incidence and nutritional status with particular reference to body weight and height.

Authors:  F de Waard
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; M D Gammon; E M John
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Serum insulin-like growth factor-I and breast cancer.

Authors:  P Toniolo; P F Bruning; A Akhmedkhanov; J M Bonfrer; K L Koenig; A Lukanova; R E Shore; A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Evidence of prenatal influences on breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A Ekbom; D Trichopoulos; H O Adami; C C Hsieh; S J Lan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-10-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Serum insulin-like growth factor-I in 1030 healthy children, adolescents, and adults: relation to age, sex, stage of puberty, testicular size, and body mass index.

Authors:  A Juul; P Bang; N T Hertel; K Main; P Dalgaard; K Jørgensen; J Müller; K Hall; N E Skakkebaek
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Height, weight and menarcheal age of Oslo schoolchildren during the last 60 years.

Authors:  G H Brundtland; K Liestøl; L Walløe
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.533

9.  Genetic and environmental influences on growth.

Authors:  R J Rona; S Chinn
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.136

10.  Body height and risk of breast cancer. A prospective study of 23,831 Norwegian women.

Authors:  L J Vatten; S Kvinnsland
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Body size and risk of luminal, HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Kathleen E Malone; Peggy L Porter; Janet R Daling; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Breast cancer incidence in food- vs non-food-producing areas in Norway: possible beneficial effects of World War II.

Authors:  Trude Eid Robsahm; S Tretli
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.