Literature DB >> 11592625

The effect of subthreshold prepulses on the recruitment order in a nerve trunk analyzed in a simple and a realistic volume conductor model.

K E Deurloo1, J Holsheimer, P Bergveld.   

Abstract

The influence of subthreshold depolarizing prepulses on the threshold current-to-distance and the threshold current-to-diameter relationship of myelinated nerve fibers has been investigated. A nerve fiber model was used in combination with both a simple, homogeneous volume conductor model with a point source and a realistic, inhomogeneous volume conductor model of a monofascicular nerve trunk surrounded by a cuff electrode. The models predict that a subthreshold depolarizing prepulse will desensitize Ranvier nodes of fibers in the vicinity of the cathode and thus cause an increase in the threshold current of a subsequent pulse to activate these fibers. If the increase in threshold current of the excited node is large enough, the excitation will be accompanied by a strong hyperpolarization of adjacent nodes, preventing the propagation of action potentials in these fibers. As fibers close to the electrode are more desensitized by prepulses than more distant ones, it is possible to stimulate distant fibers without stimulating such fibers close to the electrode. Moreover, as larger fibers are more desensitized than smaller ones, smaller fibers have lower threshold currents than larger fibers up to a certain distance from the electrode. The realistic model has provided an additional condition for the application of this method to invert nerve fiber recruitment, i.e., real or virtual anodes should be close to the cathode. When using a cuff electrode for this purpose, in the case of monopolar stimulation the cuff length (determining the position of the virtual anodes) should not exceed twice the internodal length of the fibers to be blocked. Similarly, the distance between cathode and anodes should not exceed the internodal length of these fibers when stimulation is to be applied tripolarly.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11592625     DOI: 10.1007/s004220100253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  7 in total

1.  Separated interface nerve electrode prevents direct current induced nerve damage.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Selective activation of small-diameter motor fibres using exponentially rising waveforms: a theoretical study.

Authors:  K Hennings; L Arendt-Nielsen; S S Christensen; O K Andersen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Probabilistic modeling of selective stimulation of the human sciatic nerve with a flat interface nerve electrode.

Authors:  Matthew A Schiefer; Dustin J Tyler; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Fascicular perineurium thickness, size, and position affect model predictions of neural excitation.

Authors:  Yanina Grinberg; Matthew A Schiefer; Dustin J Tyler; Kenneth J Gustafson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  Model-based analysis and design of waveforms for efficient neural stimulation.

Authors:  Warren M Grill
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Sub-threshold depolarizing pre-pulses can enhance the efficiency of biphasic stimuli in transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Jose Luis Vargas Luna; Winfried Mayr; Jorge-Armando Cortés-Ramirez
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Preferential activation of small cutaneous fibers through small pin electrode also depends on the shape of a long duration electrical current.

Authors:  Rosa Hugosdottir; Carsten Dahl Mørch; Ole Kæseler Andersen; Thordur Helgason; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.