Literature DB >> 11591629

Dietary protein and weight reduction: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism of the American Heart Association.

S T St Jeor, B V Howard, T E Prewitt, V Bovee, T Bazzarre, R H Eckel.   

Abstract

High-protein diets have recently been proposed as a "new" strategy for successful weight loss. However, variations of these diets have been popular since the 1960s. High-protein diets typically offer wide latitude in protein food choices, are restrictive in other food choices (mainly carbohydrates), and provide structured eating plans. They also often promote misconceptions about carbohydrates, insulin resistance, ketosis, and fat burning as mechanisms of action for weight loss. Although these diets may not be harmful for most healthy people for a short period of time, there are no long-term scientific studies to support their overall efficacy and safety. These diets are generally associated with higher intakes of total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol because the protein is provided mainly by animal sources. In high-protein diets, weight loss is initially high due to fluid loss related to reduced carbohydrate intake, overall caloric restriction, and ketosis-induced appetite suppression. Beneficial effects on blood lipids and insulin resistance are due to the weight loss, not to the change in caloric composition. Promoters of high-protein diets promise successful results by encouraging high-protein food choices that are usually restricted in other diets, thus providing initial palatability, an attractive alternative to other weight-reduction diets that have not worked for a variety of reasons for most individuals. High-protein diets are not recommended because they restrict healthful foods that provide essential nutrients and do not provide the variety of foods needed to adequately meet nutritional needs. Individuals who follow these diets are therefore at risk for compromised vitamin and mineral intake, as well as potential cardiac, renal, bone, and liver abnormalities overall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591629     DOI: 10.1161/hc4001.096152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  44 in total

1.  Nutritional geometry: gorillas prioritize non-protein energy while consuming surplus protein.

Authors:  Jessica M Rothman; David Raubenheimer; Colin A Chapman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Comparison of the effects of weight loss from a high-protein versus standard-protein energy-restricted diet on strength and aerobic capacity in overweight and obese men.

Authors:  Thomas P Wycherley; Jonathan D Buckley; Manny Noakes; Peter M Clifton; Grant D Brinkworth
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 3.  New thoughts on managing obesity.

Authors:  P G Kopelman; C Grace
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  [Cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation].

Authors:  C von Schacky
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Diet modification for treatment and prevention of obesity.

Authors:  Rosane Ness-Abramof; Caroline M Apovian
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Low-carbohydrate or low-fat diets for the metabolic syndrome?

Authors:  Michael L Dansinger; Ernst J Schaefer
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  History may be the Best Guide for Determining the Athlete's Dietary Protein Needs.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Filippo Spiezia; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 8.  Protein - Which is Best?

Authors:  Jay R Hoffman; Michael J Falvo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 9.  Aggressive diets and lipid responses.

Authors:  Claudia Panzer; Caroline M Apovian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Moderate energy restriction with high protein diet results in healthier outcome in women.

Authors:  Antti A Mero; Heikki Huovinen; Olle Matintupa; Juha J Hulmi; Risto Puurtinen; Hannele Hohtari; Tuomo Am Karila
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.