PURPOSE: To compare the effects of two low-fat, hypoenergetic diets differing in carbohydrate-to-protein ratio, on strength and aerobic capacity measures in overweight and obese men. METHODS: In a parallel design, 56 men (age, 45.5 ± 8.7 years; BMI, 33.6 ± 3.9 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to a low-fat, energy-restricted diet (7,000 kJ/day) with either high protein (HP: protein/carbohydrate/fat % energy, 35:40:25) or standard protein (SP, 17:58:25). Body weight, body composition, muscle strength and aerobic capacity were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. RESULTS:Forty-two participants completed the study (HP, n = 21; SP, n = 21). Both groups experienced similar reductions in body weight (HP, -10.7 ± 5.3 kg [-9.8%]; SP, -8.7 ± 3.5 kg [-8.4%]) and fat-free mass (HP, -2.8 ± 3.6 kg; SP, -3.2 ± 2.7 kg; P < 0.001 time; P > 0.14 time × group interaction). There was a trend for a greater reduction in fat mass in the HP diet group, (-7.7 ± 4.3 kg [-21.2%] vs. -5.4 ± 3.3 kg [-15.1%]; P < 0.001 time; P = 0.06 time × group interaction). Absolute peak oxygen uptake did not change in either group (P = 0.39 time; P = 0.50 time × group interaction). Overall, in both groups, relative peak oxygen uptake increased (2.9 ± 2.8 ml kg(-1) min(-1) [8.9%]), peak isometric knee extensor strength increased (14.1 ± 35.7 Nm [7.1%]) and peak handgrip strength decreased (-1.6 ± 4.1 kg [-3%]) (P ≤ 0.02 time for all), with no diet effect (P ≤ 0.23 time × group interaction). CONCLUSION: In overweight and obese men, both a HP and SP diet reduced body weight and improved body composition with similar effects on strength and aerobic capacity.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of two low-fat, hypoenergetic diets differing in carbohydrate-to-protein ratio, on strength and aerobic capacity measures in overweight and obesemen. METHODS: In a parallel design, 56 men (age, 45.5 ± 8.7 years; BMI, 33.6 ± 3.9 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to a low-fat, energy-restricted diet (7,000 kJ/day) with either high protein (HP: protein/carbohydrate/fat % energy, 35:40:25) or standard protein (SP, 17:58:25). Body weight, body composition, muscle strength and aerobic capacity were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-two participants completed the study (HP, n = 21; SP, n = 21). Both groups experienced similar reductions in body weight (HP, -10.7 ± 5.3 kg [-9.8%]; SP, -8.7 ± 3.5 kg [-8.4%]) and fat-free mass (HP, -2.8 ± 3.6 kg; SP, -3.2 ± 2.7 kg; P < 0.001 time; P > 0.14 time × group interaction). There was a trend for a greater reduction in fat mass in the HP diet group, (-7.7 ± 4.3 kg [-21.2%] vs. -5.4 ± 3.3 kg [-15.1%]; P < 0.001 time; P = 0.06 time × group interaction). Absolute peak oxygen uptake did not change in either group (P = 0.39 time; P = 0.50 time × group interaction). Overall, in both groups, relative peak oxygen uptake increased (2.9 ± 2.8 ml kg(-1) min(-1) [8.9%]), peak isometric knee extensor strength increased (14.1 ± 35.7 Nm [7.1%]) and peak handgrip strength decreased (-1.6 ± 4.1 kg [-3%]) (P ≤ 0.02 time for all), with no diet effect (P ≤ 0.23 time × group interaction). CONCLUSION: In overweight and obesemen, both a HP and SP diet reduced body weight and improved body composition with similar effects on strength and aerobic capacity.
Authors: K A McAuley; C M Hopkins; K J Smith; R T McLay; S M Williams; R W Taylor; J I Mann Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Donald K Layman; Richard A Boileau; Donna J Erickson; James E Painter; Harn Shiue; Carl Sather; Demtra D Christou Journal: J Nutr Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Matthew J W Furber; Gregory R Young; Giles S Holt; Simone Pyle; Glen Davison; Michael G Roberts; Justin D Roberts; Glyn Howatson; Darren L Smith Journal: mSystems Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Jose Antonio; Darren G Candow; Scott C Forbes; Michael J Ormsbee; Patrick G Saracino; Justin Roberts Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Bruna M Giglio; Raquel M Schincaglia; Alexandre S da Silva; Ieda C S Fazani; Paula A Monteiro; João F Mota; Juliana P Cunha; Claude Pichard; Gustavo D Pimentel Journal: Nutrients Date: 2019-09-02 Impact factor: 5.717