Literature DB >> 11591014

Certificate of need and the quality of cardiac surgery.

J L Robinson1, D B Nash, E Moxey, J P O'Connor.   

Abstract

Historically, states have used Certificate of Need (CON) programs to review proposals for new construction and expanded services in an effort to control costs and to improve the quality of and promote access to health care services. Congressional funding for CON ended in 1987. However, today, 26 states use CON to regulate cardiac surgery. There has been little evidence of the impact of CON on the quality of services. Pennsylvania is in a unique position to study the impact of CON on the quality and outcomes of care because the state terminated CON in 1996 and has publicly reported quality and outcomes data on coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgeries since 1992. Using a statewide inpatient data-reporting system, the volumes and outcomes of CABG surgeries at all Pennsylvania hospitals were examined in the 3 years prior to and the 3 years after the termination of CON. In the 3 years following the elimination of CON, the number of open-heart surgery programs increased 25%, yet there was no significant increase in the number of CABG surgeries performed. Quality, as measured by mortality rate, was not impacted by the real-location of the relatively stable CABG volume in the short term; this may be due, in part, to itinerant surgeons and statewide public performance monitoring. The long-term implications of deregulation are unclear and deserve future study.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11591014     DOI: 10.1177/106286060101600502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  7 in total

1.  Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services.

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Joseph S Ross; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Does certificate of need affect cardiac outcomes and costs?

Authors:  Vivian Ho
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2007-03-06

3.  The Effect of Certificate of Need Laws on All-Cause Mortality.

Authors:  James Bailey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Certificate of Need (CON) for cardiac care: controversy over the contributions of CON.

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Meei-Hsiang Ku-Goto; James G Jollis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Government Regulation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume, Access and Outcomes: Insights From the Washington State Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Akash Kataruka; Charles C Maynard; Ravi S Hira; Larry Dean; Todd Dardas; Hitinder Gurm; Josiah Brown; Michael E Ring; Jacob A Doll
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 6.106

6.  Certificate of need laws: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Conover; James Bailey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Association of Statewide Certificate of Need Regulations With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and Outcomes.

Authors:  Philip W Chui; Craig S Parzynski; Joseph S Ross; Nihar R Desai; Hitinder S Gurm; John A Spertus; Arnold H Seto; Vivian Ho; Jeptha P Curtis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.