Literature DB >> 17893007

Cardiac Certificate of Need regulations and the availability and use of revascularization services.

Vivian Ho1, Joseph S Ross, Brahmajee K Nallamothu, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many states enforce Certificate of Need (CON) regulations for cardiac procedures, but little is known about how CON affects utilization. We assessed the association between cardiac CON regulations, availability of revascularization facilities, and revascularization rates.
METHODS: We determined when state cardiac CON regulations were active and obtained data for Medicare beneficiaries > or = 65 years old who received coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1989 and 2002. We compared the number of hospitals performing revascularization and patient utilization in states with and without CON regulations, and in states which discontinued CON regulations during 1989 to 2002.
RESULTS: Each year, the per capita number of hospitals performing CABG and PCI was higher in states without CON (3.7 per 100,000 elderly for CABG, 4.5 for PCI in 2002), compared with CON states (2.5 for CABG, 3.0 for PCI in 2002). Multivariate regressions that adjusted for market and population characteristics found no difference in CABG utilization rates between states with and without CON (P = .7). However, CON was associated with 19.2% fewer PCIs per 1000 elderly (P = .01), equivalent to 322,526 fewer PCIs for 1989 to 2002. Among most states that discontinued CON, the number of hospitals performing PCI rose in the mid 1990s, but there were no consistent trends in the number of hospitals performing CABG or in PCIs or CABGs per capita.
CONCLUSIONS: Certificate of Need restricts the number of cardiac facilities, but its effect on utilization rates may vary by procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17893007      PMCID: PMC2084214          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  15 in total

1.  Technological development and medical productivity: the diffusion of angioplasty in New York state.

Authors:  David M Cutler; Robert S Huckman
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Are market forces strong enough to deliver efficient health care systems? Confidence is waning.

Authors:  Len M Nichols; Paul B Ginsburg; Robert A Berenson; Jon Christianson; Robert E Hurley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Market forces and efficient health care systems.

Authors:  Alain C Enthoven
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Certificate of need, volume, and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcomes.

Authors:  Vivian Ho
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Health planning in the United States and the decline of public-interest policymaking.

Authors:  Evan M Melhado
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Does removing certificate-of-need regulations lead to a surge in health care spending?

Authors:  C J Conover; F A Sloan
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.265

7.  Certificate of need regulations and use of coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ioana Popescu; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Demosthenes G Katritsis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Mortality in Medicare beneficiaries following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in states with and without certificate of need regulation.

Authors:  Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Edward L Hannan; Carol J Gormley; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Certificate of Need (CON) for cardiac care: controversy over the contributions of CON.

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Meei-Hsiang Ku-Goto; James G Jollis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Association of State Certificate of Need Regulation With Procedural Volume, Market Share, and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Tarik K Yuce; Jeanette W Chung; Cynthia Barnard; Karl Y Bilimoria
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Government Regulation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Volume, Access and Outcomes: Insights From the Washington State Cardiac Care Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Akash Kataruka; Charles C Maynard; Ravi S Hira; Larry Dean; Todd Dardas; Hitinder Gurm; Josiah Brown; Michael E Ring; Jacob A Doll
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 6.106

4.  Certificate of need laws: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Conover; James Bailey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Association of Statewide Certificate of Need Regulations With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Appropriateness and Outcomes.

Authors:  Philip W Chui; Craig S Parzynski; Joseph S Ross; Nihar R Desai; Hitinder S Gurm; John A Spertus; Arnold H Seto; Vivian Ho; Jeptha P Curtis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Appropriateness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Appropriate Use Criteria Outperform Certificate of Need.

Authors:  H Vernon Anderson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.