Literature DB >> 11590812

Indications and contraindications for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

M H Sokoloff1, C B Brendler.   

Abstract

Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy can be performed safely in most men undergoing radical prostatectomy. As is true in many aspects of prostate cancer diagnosis and therapy, the key element is patient selection. With many prostate tumors diagnosed at an earlier stage, the authors have seen a shift toward more favorable pathologic findings at the time of surgery. Concomitant with the success of early detection of prostate cancer is the realization that men are younger at the time of diagnosis and more interested in preserving sexual function. This article has described factors associated with an increased risk for extraprostatic tumor and, subsequently, an increased possibility of postprostatectomy cancer recurrence. Except for the previously mentioned absolute contraindications, none of these factors, by themselves, should be used to exclude a patient from nerve-sparing prostatectomy. Instead, meticulous attention must be given to the surgical dissection. If any doubt remains regarding residual tumor, the surgeon should err on the side of caution and remove the neurovascular bundle. The use of standardized intraoperative frozen-section analysis can help guide these decisions. The patient must be informed before surgery regarding the risks of nerve-sparing surgery, the potency rates of the surgeon, and the possibility that, to ensure adequate cancer control, the nerves may be sacrificed despite any preoperative optimism favoring the potential for their salvage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11590812     DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70161-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  12 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Capsular incision in normal prostatic tissue during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a new concept or a waste of time?

Authors:  Nicolas Koutlidis; Céline Duperron; Mathilde Funes de la Vega; Eric Mourey; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Biopsy related prostate status does not affect on the clinicopathological outcome of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Young Hwii Ko; Sung Gu Kang; Seok Ho Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

4.  Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Elmar Heinrich; Georg Schön; Frank Schiefelbein; Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Li; Qing Jiang; Qiubo Li; Yuanfeng Zhang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Can 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect prostate cancer extracapsular extension?

Authors:  Yannick Cerantola; Massimo Valerio; Aida Kawkabani Marchini; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Patrice Jichlinski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Local staging with multiparametric MRI in daily clinical practice: diagnostic accuracy and evaluation of a radiologic learning curve.

Authors:  B H E Jansen; F H K Oudshoorn; A M Tijans; M J Yska; A P Lont; E R P Collette; J A Nieuwenhuijzen; A N Vis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Open and robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hendrik van Poppel; Wouter Everaerts; Lorenzo Tosco; Steven Joniau
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-12-08

10.  Occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christine Barul; Marie-Elise Parent
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.