Literature DB >> 11590806

The role of imaging studies and molecular markers for selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy.

J W Moul1, C J Kane, S B Malkowicz.   

Abstract

For the typical patient who has newly diagnosed prostate cancer, clinically organ-confined disease of moderate grade, and a PSA less than 10 ng/mL, the current role of imaging studies and molecular biomarkers is limited. Bone scans are not necessary for newly diagnosed men with a PSA less than 10 ng/mL in the absence of bone pain. Similarly, abdominal and pelvic CT scanning rarely provides any useful diagnostic or staging information when the PSA is less the 20 ng/mL and is indicated rarely. Endorectal coil MR imaging adds staging information for patients with a PSA between 10 and 20 ng/mL, a Gleason score of 7 or less, and 50% or more positive biopsies on a sextant sampling. Indium 111 capromab pendetide scanning (ProstaScint) is FDA-approved to evaluate newly diagnosed patients at high risk for metastases. These patients have a Gleason score of 7 or greater and a PSA greater than 20 ng/mL, a Gleason score of 8 to 10 regardless of the PSA value, or clinical stage T3 disease and a Gleason score of 6 or greater. RT-PCR testing of blood or bone marrow for prostate-specific or prostate cancer-specific gene expression, or "molecular staging," is a promising technique whose current use is still investigational. Much useful information may be gained by careful study of prostate needle biopsy material. Aside from current Gleason grading and the number or percentage of cores involved with cancer, no molecular biomarker is approved for clinical use. p27, p53, bcl-2, Ki-67 (MIB-1), and the assessment of neovascularity hold promise, but prospective multicenter studies are needed. In the long-term, multiple gene expression profiling of biopsy material using gene chips may revolutionize the care of patients with prostate cancer and those who elect radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11590806     DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70155-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  4 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Molecular staging by RT-pCR analysis for PSA and PSMA in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples is an independent predictor of time to biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Constantine S Mitsiades; Peter Lembessis; Antigone Sourla; Constantine Milathianakis; Athanassios Tsintavis; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  T2-weighted MR imaging of prostate cancer: multishot echo-planar imaging vs fast spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Kiyohisa Nagai; Yoshimasa Jo; Masayuki Gyoten; Shigeki Imai; Yasumasa Kajihara; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Psa and Other Biomarkers for Early Detection, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Prost a Te Cancer.

Authors:  Michel Langlois; Victor Blaton
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2005-05-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.