Literature DB >> 11587670

[Total inverted shoulder prosthesis and rotator cuff insufficiency: evaluation and determination of anatomical parameters predictive of good functional outcome in 21 shoulders].

P Renaud1, H Wahab, L Bontoux, M Dauty, I Richard, C Brégeon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the functional results of the Delta 3 inverted shoulder prosthesis and determination of a radio-anatomical index predictive of best functional outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 19 patients (21 shoulders). Clinical (pain, satisfaction, amplitudes, Constant index) and radiological (acromio-epiphyseal distance) evaluation at a mean follow up of 13.6 months.
RESULTS: Outcomes concerning pain, quality of life and Constant index were good and similar to other series. Few complications were observed. An increase of the acromio-epiphyseal distance of 33 to 50% compared to the non operated side is associated with a good functional result.
CONCLUSION: Our results confirm those of other series and show that Delta 3 inverted prosthesis is an efficient therapeutic alternative in arthropathy with rotator cuff tears. Rehabilitation is fairly short and easy. The increase of the acromio-epiphyseal distance determines the tension of the deltoid muscle and could predict a favorable outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11587670     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-6054(01)00102-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Readapt Med Phys        ISSN: 0168-6054


  7 in total

Review 1.  Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Tom Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty comparing X-rays and computerised tomography.

Authors:  Birgit S Werner; Matthew Daggett; Yannick Carrillon; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reproducibility of a new method for measuring lowering and medialisation of the humerus after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Axel Marcoin; Antoine Ferrier; Laurent Blasco; Paul De Boissieu; Cécile Nerot; Xavier Ohl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Pre-operative factors influence the recovery of range of motion following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Collin; Tetsuya Matsukawa; Patrick J Denard; Solenn Gain; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Troy A Roberson; Ellen Shanley; Jeffrey T Abildgaard; Charles M Granade; Kyle J Adams; James T Griscom; Quinn Hunt; Quinn Nix; Michael J Kissenberth; Stefan J Tolan; Richard J Hawkins; John M Tokish
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-03-11

6.  Radiologic Comparison of Humeral Position according to the Implant Designs Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Analysis between Medial Glenoid/Medial Humerus, Lateral Glenoid/Medial Humerus, and Medial Glenoid/Lateral Humerus Designs.

Authors:  Nam Su Cho; Ju Hyun Nam; Se Jung Hong; Tae Wook Kim; Myeong Gu Lee; Jung Tae Ahn; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2018-12-01

7.  CT scan evaluation of glenoid bone and pectoralis major tendon: interest in shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Laurent Obert; Christelle Peyron; Etienne Boyer; Gauthier Menu; François Loisel; Sébastien Aubry
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-10-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.