PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetics of d-methylphenidate (d-MPH) would be altered by food ingested before administration of an immediate release formulation (dl-MPH- IR) but not when food is ingested before a slow release formulation (dl-MPH-SR). METHODS: A randomized, four-phase, open label, crossover design was conducted in 24 healthy men who each received, onseparate occasions, dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR taken after an overnight fast and 15 min after a standardized breakfast (20% protein, 21% fat, 59% carbohydrate). Plasma MPH levels were monitored by a validated, stereoselective. GLC-ECD method. RESULTS: For plasma d-MPH, there were significant differences (ANOVA) between dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR in tmax, Cmax (peak exposure), and Cmax/AUC (sensitive to rate of absorption). Dl-MPH-SR on average delayed tmax from 2.3 to 3.7 h and lowered Cmax 34%. There was no significant difference between the formulations in AUC (extent of absorption). For dl-MPH-IR, food significantly increased Cmax (23%) and AUC (15%) and for dl-MPH-SR the corresponding increases were Cmax (17%) and AUC (14%). After dl-MPH-IR, food delayed average tmax from 2.0 to 2.5 but had no effect on tmax after dl-MPH-SR. There was no effect of food on Cmax/AUC (rate of absorption). CONCLUSIONS: Food caused a significant increase in extent of absorption but had no effect on rate of absorption of d-MPH after either dl-MPHIR or dl-MPH-SR.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetics of d-methylphenidate (d-MPH) would be altered by food ingested before administration of an immediate release formulation (dl-MPH- IR) but not when food is ingested before a slow release formulation (dl-MPH-SR). METHODS: A randomized, four-phase, open label, crossover design was conducted in 24 healthy men who each received, on separate occasions, dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR taken after an overnight fast and 15 min after a standardized breakfast (20% protein, 21% fat, 59% carbohydrate). Plasma MPH levels were monitored by a validated, stereoselective. GLC-ECD method. RESULTS: For plasma d-MPH, there were significant differences (ANOVA) between dl-MPH-IR and dl-MPH-SR in tmax, Cmax (peak exposure), and Cmax/AUC (sensitive to rate of absorption). Dl-MPH-SR on average delayed tmax from 2.3 to 3.7 h and lowered Cmax 34%. There was no significant difference between the formulations in AUC (extent of absorption). For dl-MPH-IR, food significantly increased Cmax (23%) and AUC (15%) and for dl-MPH-SR the corresponding increases were Cmax (17%) and AUC (14%). After dl-MPH-IR, food delayed average tmax from 2.0 to 2.5 but had no effect on tmax after dl-MPH-SR. There was no effect of food on Cmax/AUC (rate of absorption). CONCLUSIONS: Food caused a significant increase in extent of absorption but had no effect on rate of absorption of d-MPH after either dl-MPHIR or dl-MPH-SR.
Authors: B A Faraj; Z H Israili; J M Perel; M L Jenkins; S G Holtzman; S A Cucinell; P G Dayton Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1974-12 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Kathrin Finke; Chris M Dodds; Peter Bublak; Ralf Regenthal; Frank Baumann; Tom Manly; Ulrich Müller Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Jianyuan Deng; Xiao Zhu; Zongmeng Chen; Chun Ho Fan; Him Shek Kwan; Chi Ho Wong; Ka Yi Shek; Zhong Zuo; Tai Ning Lam Journal: Drugs Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Ulrich Müller; J Suckling; F Zelaya; G Honey; H Faessel; S C R Williams; C Routledge; J Brown; T W Robbins; E T Bullmore Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-09-14 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Ronald Steingard; Sarper Taskiran; Daniel F Connor; John S Markowitz; Mark A Stein Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Rene Braeckman; Sven Guenther; Travis C Mickle; Andrew C Barrett; Adam Smith; Charles Oh Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.031
Authors: John S Markowitz; Arthur B Straughn; Kennerly S Patrick; C Lindsay DeVane; Linda Pestreich; James Lee; Yanfeng Wang; Rafael Muniz Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2003 Impact factor: 6.447