Literature DB >> 26729760

Absorption Differences between Immediate-Release Dexmethylphenidate and dl-Methylphenidate.

Kennerly S Patrick1, Arthur B Straughn2.   

Abstract

The postulate that twice the milligram/kilogram dose of dl-methylphenidate (dl-MPH) would result in equal exposure to d-MPH compared with half that milligram/kilogram dose of the chiral switch product dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) was tested. Using a randomized, crossover study design, 12 men and 12 women received either immediate-release (IR) dl-MPH (0.3 mg/kg) or IR d-MPH (0.15 mg/kg). Relative bioavailability comparisons included partial area under the plasma concentration-time curves (pAUC0-3 h) for d-MPH. The pAUC0-3 h is a new regulatory metric presently only required for bioequivalence testing of a specific dl-MPH modified-release product. The geometric mean ratios for both the Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-∞) were within the 90% confidence interval (CI) regulatory range of 0.8-1.25, indicating that these two drugs were bioequivalent in terms of d-MPH. However, the pAUC0-3 h geometric mean ratio for d-MPH after IR dl-MPH versus IR d-MPH was 0.76 (P < 0.001; 90% CI, 0.67-0.87), showing significantly less early exposure to the d-isomer than IR d-MPH. The 1-hour d-MPH concentration after dl-MPH was 56% of that after the enantiopure drug. The maximum d-MPH plasma concentration (Cmax) for dl-MPH was also significantly lower for dl-MPH (P < 0.05; CI, 1.02-1.19), whereas the AUC0-∞ ratio of 0.89 was not significantly different (P = 0.21; CI, 0.98-1.13). The AUC0-3 h difference reported here points to the potential limitations of using bioequivalence for sound predictions of dose-response relationships. Knowledge of the greater early exposure to d-MPH after the pure d-isomer drug compared with the racemate may contribute to drug individualization/optimization in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Copyright © 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26729760      PMCID: PMC4767384          DOI: 10.1124/dmd.115.067975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of acute behavioral effects of sustained-release and immediate-release methylphenidate.

Authors:  S H Kollins; C R Rush; P J Pazzaglia; J A Ali
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 2.  The pharmacology of citalopram enantiomers: the antagonism by R-citalopram on the effect of S-citalopram.

Authors:  Connie Sánchez
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.080

3.  Comparative pharmacodynamics and plasma concentrations of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride after single doses of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover laboratory school study in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Declan Quinn; Sharon Wigal; James Swanson; Sharon Hirsch; Yvonne Ottolini; Maghsoud Dariani; Mark Roffman; Jerome Zeldis; Thomas Cooper
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride and d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Sharon Wigal; James M Swanson; David Feifel; R Bart Sangal; Josephine Elia; Charles D Casat; Jerome B Zeldis; C Keith Conners
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  A post hoc analysis of d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (focalin) versus d,l-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride (ritalin).

Authors:  Margaret Weiss; Michael Wasdell; John Patin
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Influence of ethanol and gender on methylphenidate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  K S Patrick; A B Straughn; R R Minhinnett; S D Yeatts; A E Herrin; C L DeVane; R Malcolm; G C Janis; J S Markowitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Development of enantioselective gas chromatographic quantitation assay for dl-threo-methylphenidate in biological fluids.

Authors:  H K Lim; J W Hubbard; K K Midha
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1986-05-28

8.  PET study examining pharmacokinetics, detection and likeability, and dopamine transporter receptor occupancy of short- and long-acting oral methylphenidate.

Authors:  Thomas J Spencer; Joseph Biederman; Patrick E Ciccone; Bertha K Madras; Darin D Dougherty; Ali A Bonab; Elijahu Livni; Dolly A Parasrampuria; Alan J Fischman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  A single-dose, two-way crossover, bioequivalence study of dexmethylphenidate HCl with and without food in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Steve K Teo; Michael R Scheffler; Anfan Wu; David I Stirling; Steve D Thomas; Daria Stypinski; Vikram D Khetani
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  Pharmacology of the enantiomers of threo-methylphenidate.

Authors:  K S Patrick; R W Caldwell; R M Ferris; G R Breese
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  3 in total

1.  Potential for Underestimation of d-Methylphenidate Bioavailability Using Chiral Derivatization/Gas Chromatography.

Authors:  Kennerly S Patrick; Wendy Rodriguez
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  Quantitative Characterization of the Smoothness of Extended-release Methylphenidate Pharmacokinetic Profiles.

Authors:  Michelle D Po; Roberto Gomeni; Bev Incledon
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep

3.  Ethanol Interactions With Dexmethylphenidate and dl-Methylphenidate Spheroidal Oral Drug Absorption Systems in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Hao-Jie Zhu; Kennerly S Patrick; Arthur B Straughn; Owen T Reeves; Hilary Bernstein; Jian Shi; Heather J Johnson; Joshua M Knight; Aaron T Smith; Robert J Malcolm; John S Markowitz
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.