E N Perencevich1, M T Wong, A D Harris. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumer antibacterial soaps contain triclosan or triclocarban. No scientific data have been published to suggest that the use of antibacterial agents in household products prevents infection, and triclosan resistance mechanisms have recently been identified. Little data are available regarding the prevalence of antibacterial agents contained in consumer soaps. METHODS: In a physician-performed survey of 23 stores in 10 states from December 1999 to April 2000, investigators determined the number of national brand liquid and bar soaps and percent of each containing antibacterial agents sold at national chain, regional grocery, and Internet stores. RESULTS: Antibacterial agents were present in 76% of liquid soaps and 29% of bar soaps available nationally. There were no differences found between national, regional, and Internet stores. CONCLUSION: Overall, 45% of surveyed soaps contain antibacterial agents. With limited documented benefits and experimental laboratory evidence suggesting possible adverse effects on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, consumer antibacterial use of this magnitude should be questioned.
BACKGROUND: Consumer antibacterial soaps contain triclosan or triclocarban. No scientific data have been published to suggest that the use of antibacterial agents in household products prevents infection, and triclosan resistance mechanisms have recently been identified. Little data are available regarding the prevalence of antibacterial agents contained in consumer soaps. METHODS: In a physician-performed survey of 23 stores in 10 states from December 1999 to April 2000, investigators determined the number of national brand liquid and bar soaps and percent of each containing antibacterial agents sold at national chain, regional grocery, and Internet stores. RESULTS: Antibacterial agents were present in 76% of liquid soaps and 29% of bar soaps available nationally. There were no differences found between national, regional, and Internet stores. CONCLUSION: Overall, 45% of surveyed soaps contain antibacterial agents. With limited documented benefits and experimental laboratory evidence suggesting possible adverse effects on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, consumer antibacterial use of this magnitude should be questioned.
Authors: Ki Chang Ahn; Takeo Kasagami; Hsing-Ju Tsai; Nils Helge Schebb; Temitope Ogunyoku; Shirley J Gee; Thomas M Young; Bruce D Hammock Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Pahriya Ashrap; Deborah J Watkins; Antonia M Calafat; Xiaoyun Ye; Zaira Rosario; Phil Brown; Carmen M Vélez-Vega; Akram Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Paula I Johnson; Erica Koustas; Hanna M Vesterinen; Patrice Sutton; Dylan S Atchley; Allegra N Kim; Marlissa Campbell; James M Donald; Saunak Sen; Lisa Bero; Lauren Zeise; Tracey J Woodruff Journal: Environ Int Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Julia K MacIsaac; Roy R Gerona; Paul D Blanc; Latifat Apatira; Matthew W Friesen; Michael Coppolino; Sarah Janssen Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Rebekah C M Kennedy; Fu-Min Menn; Laura Healy; Kellie A Fecteau; Pan Hu; Jiyoung Bae; Nancy A Gee; Bill L Lasley; Ling Zhao; Jiangang Chen Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 3.060