| Literature DB >> 11580863 |
M Abedi1, G Caponigro, J Shen, S Hansen, T Sandrock, A Kamb.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcriptional transactivation is a process with remarkable tolerance for sequence diversity and structural geometry. In studies of the features that constitute transactivating functions, acidity has remained one of the most common characteristics observed among native activation domains and activator peptides.Entities:
Year: 2001 PMID: 11580863 PMCID: PMC56998 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-2-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Mol Biol ISSN: 1471-2199 Impact factor: 2.946
Figure 1Cartoon of peptide libraries fused to lexA molecules. +GPF is a truncated GFP molecule of 157 amino acids. CAS is the 11-residue core activating sequence (see Results).
Breakdown of amino acid composition. "p" is the conventional p value for the difference between the observations of amino acids among Activators and Random sequences, assuming that the expected variance for the difference is the sum of the Poisson variances for the number of observations. "P" is the probability that the occurrence frequency would have been observed by chance, given the sample size of 20 amino acids (i.e., P = (1 - (1 - p)20)).
| LexA-GFP/peptide | LexA-peptide | |||||||
| Amino Acid | Random | Activators | p | P | Random | Activators | p | P |
| A | 14 | 38 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 55 | 52 | 0.386 | 1.000 |
| C | 9 | 25 | 0.003 | 0.059 | 25 | 31 | 0.211 | 0.991 |
| D | 11 | 62 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 27 | 86 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| E | 10 | 46 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 16 | 31 | 0.014 | 0.251 |
| F | 10 | 20 | 0.034 | 0.499 | 23 | 83 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| G | 45 | 68 | 0.015 | 0.265 | 45 | 39 | 0.256 | 0.997 |
| H | 6 | 9 | 0.219 | 0.993 | 36 | 32 | 0.314 | 0.999 |
| I | 5 | 10 | 0.098 | 0.874 | 38 | 43 | 0.289 | 0.999 |
| K | 7 | 9 | 0.309 | 0.999 | 14 | 11 | 0.274 | 0.998 |
| L | 19 | 47 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 71 | 124 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| M | 7 | 10 | 0.233 | 0.995 | 14 | 13 | 0.424 | 1.000 |
| N | 13 | 11 | 0.342 | 1.000 | 34 | 38 | 0.319 | 1.000 |
| P | 10 | 23 | 0.012 | 0.212 | 83 | 79 | 0.377 | 1.000 |
| Q | 4 | 11 | 0.035 | 0.513 | 27 | 28 | 0.446 | 1.000 |
| R | 21 | 32 | 0.065 | 0.741 | 67 | 20 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| S | 20 | 43 | 0.002 | 0.037 | 79 | 92 | 0.160 | 0.969 |
| T | 10 | 23 | 0.012 | 0.212 | 60 | 54 | 0.287 | 0.999 |
| V | 21 | 40 | 0.007 | 0.140 | 42 | 34 | 0.179 | 0.981 |
| W | 8 | 26 | 0.001 | 0.020 | 16 | 49 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Y | 8 | 13 | 0.138 | 0.948 | 32 | 48 | 0.037 | 0.528 |
| # Sequences | 21 | 44 | 71 | 66 | ||||
| # Residues | 258 | 566 | 831 | 997 | ||||
Summary of sequence analysis.
| Library | Activator Frequency | Total Analyzed | Single | Multiple |
| LexA-GFP/peptide | 0.02% | 131 | 9 | 35 |
| LexA-peptide | 0.1% | 81 | 55 | 11 |
Figure 2Graph of net charge of lexA-GFP/peptide activator sequences. Charge is calculated assuming that D = E = -1, K = R = +1. Ordinate is the fraction of sequences with a given charge.
Figure 3Graph of net charge of lexA-peptide activator sequences (as in Figure 2).
Figure 4Bargraph of sequence features displayed by random library clones vs. activator sequences.
Retested peptide activator sequences. GFP and linker sequences are not included in the lexA-GFP/peptide activator sequences. The asterisk signifies a translational stop; other sequences continue through GFP.
| LexA-GFP/peptide | EDDDEFSLWDSML* | -6 | 8 |
| DWDYGIAFDNLGDL* | -4 | 4 | |
| EMLFTGLECGPGCEDW | -4 | 4 | |
| DCVAACDPVLDWDW | -4 | 3 | |
| HDSGLDDRMFADSEPW | -4 | 2 | |
| DCEGFPGYASDDNGQG | -4 | 2 | |
| VDDVVPEGDPG | -4 | 2 | |
| WLWDEDMRDLFQ* | -3 | 11 | |
| PTWPDSDITFWD* | -3 | 3 | |
| DGSYGPAWLEECLGT | -3 | 2 | |
| AWNSVEWGAEDFF* | -3 | 2 | |
| RQADDWFDEPGPAG | -3 | 2 | |
| DSLDVSLADG | -3 | 2 | |
| YYVPTGEDSSD | -3 | 2 | |
| GSHSGAMDEYEAWCS | -3 | 2 | |
| TVAVGQSWDDFLV* | -2 | 2 | |
| GVGSTRSGPSDDNADW | -2 | 3 | |
| FDPCDFLRFPTSEAC | -2 | 3 | |
| VTWWMGKFNGVLCLG | +1 | 5 | |
| KVKEFNSGGVTVCVL | +1 | 4 | |
| VFRSCTRHSHCII* | +2 | 4 | |
| VVPGLVRVIAHARVL | +2 | 2 | |
| SVVPRTRTICRGVQA | +3 | 2 | |
| LexA-peptide | WESDIWMNSLPWIED* | -4 | 4 |
| QDDFIDVSFDLLYTD* | -5 | 2 | |
| GAQDNMLDLFDCTLF* | -3 | 1 | |
| DMQYGIDWAADLCLH* | -3 | 1 | |
| DFMDLYTRILDCSDQ* | -3 | 1 | |
| TFPLLHETDFWAYPY* | -2 | 2 | |
| AFSPGLSDSTWWDLI* | -2 | 2 | |
| INFDPSLIYSCPWCGE* | -2 | 1 | |
| DVASTFEWLLPSHFG* | -2 | 1 | |
| NLYSYILEAFTSHVL* | -1 | 1 | |
| NDYWNLGSQLALAQF* | -1 | 4 | |
| VYFTDAMIGHWSLFP* | -1 | 1 | |
| QLIPDPVPFSDFCSYLNK* | -1 | 1 | |
| PPTWVPALAWLHGCI* | 0 | 1 | |
| NSHPLNHPRTTLLFF* | +1 | 2 | |
| RHRLFVPSLFDLHR* | +2 | 1 |
Figure 5Bar graph showing results of colony formation assay. 250 yeast cells were plated on leu+ plates and leu-plates and grown at 30°C for two days. The fraction of cells that formed colonies on a leu-plate compared to a leu+ plate is plotted.
Figure 6Comparison between native activation domain and activator peptide. Patches of yeast cells on a selection (leu-) plate.