Literature DB >> 1158031

Substantial differences in the diagnostic criteria used by diabetes experts.

K M West.   

Abstract

A survey of twenty diabetologists revealed that they employ diagnostic criteria differing quite substantially. In some populations, including the general population of the United States, these disparities would result in very major differences in the rates of "diabetes." Under certain common circumstances, some diabetologists would classify as normal more than half of the one- and two-hour values considered to be abnormal by other well-qualified diabetologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1158031     DOI: 10.2337/diab.24.7.641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  9 in total

1.  The myth of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Edwin A M Gale
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-07-16       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  The genetics of diabetes: from nightmare to headache.

Authors:  H Keen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-04-11

3.  Diabetes mellitus: a new look at diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  H Keen; R J Jarrett; K G Alberti
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  The oral glucose tolerance test: an objective method of interpretation.

Authors:  P Cohen; D Dix
Journal:  Acta Diabetol Lat       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun

5.  Glycosylated haemoglobins in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and for the assessment of chronic hyperglycaemia.

Authors:  B J Boucher; S G Welch; M S Beer
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 17.152

Review 7.  [Hyperglycemia and the complications of maturity-onset diabetes].

Authors:  M D Beaulieu
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1980-04-19       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Glucose tolerance tests in 200 patients with senile cataract.

Authors:  W N Dugmore; K Tun
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 9.  Diabetes mellitus statistics on prevalence and mortality: facts and fallacies.

Authors:  Paul Zimmet; K George Alberti; Dianna J Magliano; Peter H Bennett
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 43.330

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.