R S Khattar1, R Senior, P Soman, R van der Does, A Lahiri. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital National Health Service Trust, and the Institute for Medical Research, Harrow, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the independent and combined effects of captopril and carvedilol on left ventricular remodeling in chronic heart failure. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and b-blockers are known to attenuate the remodeling process in chronic heart failure, a direct comparison of these agents has not been performed. METHODS: We investigated 57 patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure (48 ischemic, 9 nonischemic) who were randomized in a double-blind fashion to treatment with carvedilol or captopril at maximum doses of 25 mg twice daily for 3 months, followed by 3 months of combined treatment. Serial echocardiography, right heart catheterization, and treadmill exercise testing were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. After exclusions, 49 patients were evaluated during monotherapy and 48 during combination therapy. RESULTS:Carvedilol monotherapy produced significant reductions in end-systolic volume, leading to a greater median increase in ejection fraction compared with captopril monotherapy (4.7% vs 1.5%, respectively; P <.05). Each drug caused similar reductions in left ventricular mass, chamber sphericity, and pulmonary artery wedge pressure during monotherapy and combined treatment. Adjunctive treatment with carvedilol produced a trend toward a greater increase in ejection fraction (4.3% vs 2.7%, respectively; P not significant) and significantly greater reductions in the wall thickening score index than with captopril (0.25 vs 0.08, respectively; P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy did not alter left ventricular volume, treatment with carvedilol was associated with reductions in chamber volume; both drugs reduced left ventricular mass and sphericity. These beneficial effects on remodeling may help to explain the relative prognostic benefits of these therapies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the independent and combined effects of captopril and carvedilol on left ventricular remodeling in chronic heart failure. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and b-blockers are known to attenuate the remodeling process in chronic heart failure, a direct comparison of these agents has not been performed. METHODS: We investigated 57 patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure (48 ischemic, 9 nonischemic) who were randomized in a double-blind fashion to treatment with carvedilol or captopril at maximum doses of 25 mg twice daily for 3 months, followed by 3 months of combined treatment. Serial echocardiography, right heart catheterization, and treadmill exercise testing were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. After exclusions, 49 patients were evaluated during monotherapy and 48 during combination therapy. RESULTS:Carvedilol monotherapy produced significant reductions in end-systolic volume, leading to a greater median increase in ejection fraction compared with captopril monotherapy (4.7% vs 1.5%, respectively; P <.05). Each drug caused similar reductions in left ventricular mass, chamber sphericity, and pulmonary artery wedge pressure during monotherapy and combined treatment. Adjunctive treatment with carvedilol produced a trend toward a greater increase in ejection fraction (4.3% vs 2.7%, respectively; P not significant) and significantly greater reductions in the wall thickening score index than with captopril (0.25 vs 0.08, respectively; P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy did not alter left ventricular volume, treatment with carvedilol was associated with reductions in chamber volume; both drugs reduced left ventricular mass and sphericity. These beneficial effects on remodeling may help to explain the relative prognostic benefits of these therapies.
Authors: Biyi Chen; Yue Li; Shuxia Jiang; Yu-Ping Xie; Ang Guo; William Kutschke; Kathy Zimmerman; Robert M Weiss; Francis J Miller; Mark E Anderson; Long-Sheng Song Journal: FASEB J Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: N G Bellenger; K Rajappan; S L Rahman; A Lahiri; U Raval; J Webster; G D Murray; A J S Coats; J G F Cleland; D J Pennell Journal: Heart Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Ahmad A Cluntun; Rachit Badolia; Sandra Lettlova; K Mark Parnell; Thirupura S Shankar; Nikolaos A Diakos; Kristofor A Olson; Iosif Taleb; Sean M Tatum; Jordan A Berg; Corey N Cunningham; Tyler Van Ry; Alex J Bott; Aspasia Thodou Krokidi; Sarah Fogarty; Sophia Skedros; Wojciech I Swiatek; Xuejing Yu; Bai Luo; Shannon Merx; Sutip Navankasattusas; James E Cox; Gregory S Ducker; William L Holland; Stephen H McKellar; Jared Rutter; Stavros G Drakos Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Marek Grabka; Magdalena Kocierz-Woźnowska; Maciej Wybraniec; Maciej Turski; Marcin Wita; Krystian Wita; Katarzyna Mizia-Stec Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 1.426