Literature DB >> 11578789

The Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET): design and general baseline characteristics.

L Hyman1, J Gwiazda, W L Marsh-Tootle, T T Norton, M Hussein.   

Abstract

The Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) is a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, controlled clinical trial evaluating whether there is a difference in the progression of myopia between children wearing progressive addition lenses (PALs) versus conventional single vision lenses (SVLs), as measured by cycloplegic autorefraction. Axial length, measured by A-scan ultrasonography, is an additional outcome measure. To meet the recruitment goal of 450 participants, eligible children ages 6-11 years (inclusive) with myopia in both eyes (spherical equivalent between -1.25 diopters (D) and -4.50 D, astigmatism < or = 1.50 D, and anisometropia < 1.00 D) were recruited at four clinical centers between September 1997 and September 1998. Children who participated were assigned to receive PALs (Varilux Comfort with a +2.00 D addition) or SVLs. Measures include standardized cycloplegic autorefraction (Nidek ARK700A autorefractor), axial length (Sonomed A2500 ultrasound), subjective refraction (Marco TRS system), visual acuity (modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol), accommodation (Canon R-1), and phoria (cover test and Maddox rod). Outcome measures are collected annually; adherence is assessed and prescriptions updated semiannually. Participants are being followed for at least 3 years. COMET enrolled 469 children. Their mean age is 9.3 years (range 6-11 years); 52% are female. COMET children are ethnically diverse, according to a self-report with 46% White, 26% African American, 14% Hispanic, and 8% Asian. Best-corrected visual acuity is better than 20/32 in both eyes. Baseline mean (+/-SD) cycloplegic refractive correction is -2.38 D (+/-0.81) in the right eye and -2.40 D (+/-0.82) in the left eye; mean (+/-SD) axial length is 24.1 mm (+/-0.7) in both eyes. Follow-up of these children will provide a first step in answering the important question of whether there are effective means to slow myopia progression. Study results should be applicable to a large proportion of children with myopia. The study will also provide useful information on myopia progression in children wearing conventional single vision lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11578789     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00156-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  17 in total

Review 1.  Myopia.

Authors:  Douglas R Fredrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

Review 2.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

3.  Choroidal Thickness Profiles in Myopic Eyes of Young Adults in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial Cohort.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Qinghua Zhang; Wei Hou; Thomas T Norton; Katherine Weise; Keri Dirkes; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in the COMET cohort.

Authors:  Karen D Fern; Ruth E Manny; Jane Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Katherine Weise; Wendy Marsh-Tootle
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Axial Elongation in Myopic Children and its Association With Myopia Progression in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial.

Authors:  Wei Hou; Thomas T Norton; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.018

6.  Longitudinal Changes in Lens Thickness in Myopic Children Enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Thomas T Norton; Wei Hou; Leslie Hyman; Ruth Manny
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Limited change in anisometropia and aniso-axial length over 13 years in myopic children enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial.

Authors:  Li Deng; Jane Gwiazda; Ruth E Manny; Mitchell Scheiman; Erik Weissberg; Karen D Fern; Katherine Weise
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Myopia Progression in Children Wearing Spectacles vs. Switching to Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Wendy L Marsh-Tootle; Li Ming Dong; Leslie Hyman; Jane Gwiazda; Katherine K Weise; Lynette Dias; Karen D Fernp
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Myopia, contact lens use and self-esteem.

Authors:  Lynette Dias; Ruth E Manny; Erik Weissberg; Karen D Fern
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.