Literature DB >> 11578155

Core safeguards for clinical research with adults who are unable to consent.

D Wendler1, K Prasad.   

Abstract

The National Bioethics Advisory Commission has proposed new safeguards for clinical research with adults who are unable to consent. Three other major U.S. groups have also proposed additional safeguards for this population, and existing Canadian and European guidelines already include such safeguards. While these six guidelines agree on some safeguards, they disagree on others. To allow important research to proceed while protecting adults who are unable to consent, it will be crucial to resolve these differences. This paper uses a side-by-side comparison of these six guidelines to highlight their major points of consensus, analyze their significant differences, and distill six core safeguards.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; National Bioethics Advisory Commission

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11578155     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-7-200110020-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  13 in total

1.  The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Mary Jane Welch; Rachel Lally; Jennifer E Miller; Stephanie Pittman; Lynda Brodsky; Arthur L Caplan; Gina Uhlenbrauck; Darcy M Louzao; James H Fischer; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Kevin Butler; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian R Clarridge; Carie R Kennedy; Jessica LeBlanc; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  The ethics of informed consent in Alzheimer disease research.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  When does decisional impairment become decisional incompetence? Ethical and methodological issues in capacity research in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Genomic research with the newly dead: a crossroads for ethics and policy.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Eric T Juengst; Warren Whipple; Arlene M Davis
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  Surrogate consent for research involving adults with impaired decision making: survey of Institutional Review Board practices.

Authors:  Michelle Ng Gong; Gary Winkel; Rosamond Rhodes; Lynne D Richardson; Jeffrey H Silverstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants.

Authors:  Ellen Iverson; Aaron Celious; Carie R Kennedy; Erica Shehane; Alexander Eastman; Victoria Warren; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian Clarridge; Bradley D Freeman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Decision making for participation in dementia research.

Authors:  Betty S Black; Malory Wechsler; Linda Fogarty
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.105

9.  Predictors of providing informed consent or assent for research participation in assisted living residents.

Authors:  Betty S Black; Jason Brandt; Peter V Rabins; Quincy M Samus; Cynthia D Steele; Constantine G Lyketsos; Adam Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Seeking assent and respecting dissent in dementia research.

Authors:  Betty S Black; Peter V Rabins; Jeremy Sugarman; Jason H Karlawish
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.