AIMS: High quality RNA isolation from cartilaginous tissue is considered difficult because of relatively low cellularity and the abundance of extracellular matrix rich in glycosaminoglycans and collagens. Given the growing interest and technical possibilities to study RNA expression at a high throughput level, research on tissue with these characteristics is hampered by the lack of an efficient method for obtaining sufficient amounts of high quality RNA. METHODS: This paper presents a robust protocol combining two RNA isolation procedures, based on a combination of Trizol and RNA specific columns, which has been developed to obtain high molecular weight RNA from fresh frozen and stored tissue of normal cartilage and cartilaginous tumours. Using this method, RNA was isolated from normal cartilage, peripheral chondrosarcoma, and central chondrosarcoma. RESULTS: The yields ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 microg RNA/mg tissue. RNA isolated with this method was stable and of high molecular weight. RNA samples from normal cartilage and from two chondrosarcomas isolated using this method were applied successfully in cDNA microarray experiments. The number of genes that give interpretable results was in the range of what would be expected from microarray results obtained on chondrosarcoma cell line RNA. Signal to noise ratios were good and differential expression between tumour and normal cartilage was detectable for a large number of genes. CONCLUSION: With this newly developed isolation method, high quality RNA can be obtained from low cellular tissue with a high extracellular matrix component. These procedures can also be applied to other tumour material.
AIMS: High quality RNA isolation from cartilaginous tissue is considered difficult because of relatively low cellularity and the abundance of extracellular matrix rich in glycosaminoglycans and collagens. Given the growing interest and technical possibilities to study RNA expression at a high throughput level, research on tissue with these characteristics is hampered by the lack of an efficient method for obtaining sufficient amounts of high quality RNA. METHODS: This paper presents a robust protocol combining two RNA isolation procedures, based on a combination of Trizol and RNA specific columns, which has been developed to obtain high molecular weight RNA from fresh frozen and stored tissue of normal cartilage and cartilaginous tumours. Using this method, RNA was isolated from normal cartilage, peripheral chondrosarcoma, and central chondrosarcoma. RESULTS: The yields ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 microg RNA/mg tissue. RNA isolated with this method was stable and of high molecular weight. RNA samples from normal cartilage and from two chondrosarcomas isolated using this method were applied successfully in cDNA microarray experiments. The number of genes that give interpretable results was in the range of what would be expected from microarray results obtained on chondrosarcoma cell line RNA. Signal to noise ratios were good and differential expression between tumour and normal cartilage was detectable for a large number of genes. CONCLUSION: With this newly developed isolation method, high quality RNA can be obtained from low cellular tissue with a high extracellular matrix component. These procedures can also be applied to other tumour material.
Authors: M A Bernard; D A Hogue; W G Cole; T Sanford; M B Snuggs; D Montufar-Solis; P J Duke; D D Carson; A Scott; W B Van Winkle; J T Hecht Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: L Legeai-Mallet; A Rossi; C Benoist-Lasselin; R Piazza; J F Mallet; A L Delezoide; A Munnich; J Bonaventure; L Zylberberg Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J V Bovée; A M Cleton-Jansen; N J Kuipers-Dijkshoorn; L J van den Broek; A H Taminiau; C J Cornelisse; P C Hogendoorn Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: J V Bovée; M van Royen; A F Bardoel; C Rosenberg; C J Cornelisse; A M Cleton-Jansen; P C Hogendoorn Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: J DeRisi; L Penland; P O Brown; M L Bittner; P S Meltzer; M Ray; Y Chen; Y A Su; J M Trent Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: R P van Gijlswijk; H J Zijlmans; J Wiegant; M N Bobrow; T J Erickson; K E Adler; H J Tanke; A K Raap Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: Charlie C Xiang; Mei Chen; Li Ma; Quang N Phan; Jason M Inman; Olga A Kozhich; Michael J Brownstein Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2003-05-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Abhijith K Kudva; Anna D Dikina; Frank P Luyten; Eben Alsberg; Jennifer Patterson Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Yvonne M Schrage; Liesbeth Hameetman; Karoly Szuhai; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Antonie H M Taminiau; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Judith V M G Bovée Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: A-M Cleton-Jansen; J K Anninga; I H Briaire-de Bruijn; S Romeo; J Oosting; R M Egeler; H Gelderblom; A H M Taminiau; P C W Hogendoorn Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 7.640