Literature DB >> 11576566

Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour minimum.

D J Rouse1, J Owen, K G Savage, J C Hauth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To generate contemporary uterine activity and labor progress data for oxytocin-augmented labor, and assess whether 2 hours of active phase labor arrest with at least 200 Montevideo units justifies cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Five hundred and one consecutive spontaneously laboring term women with abnormally progressive labor were managed by a standardized protocol: oxytocin and intrauterine pressure catheter with an intent to sustain at least 200 Montevideo units for 4 hours or more before cesarean for labor arrest. Uterine activity was measured, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. With a sample of this size, the upper 95% confidence interval limit for an event with an observed rate of 1% is below 3%.
RESULTS: During oxytocin augmentation, nulliparas who were delivered vaginally dilated at a median rate of 1.4 cm/hour versus 1.8 cm/hour for parous women. In both groups, the 5th percentile of cervical dilation rate was 0.5 cm/hour. Thirty-eight women experienced labor arrest for over 2 hours despite at least 200 sustained Montevideo units; 23 (61%) achieved a vaginal delivery. Rates of chorioamnionitis and endometritis for the 38 women were 26%. None of their infants sustained a serious complication, including brachial plexus injury, even though three of the 23 vaginal deliveries (13%) were complicated by shoulder dystocia.
CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that oxytocin-augmented labor proceeds at substantially slower rates than spontaneous labor, and support our previous contention that the criteria of labor arrest for 2 hours, despite at least 200 sustained Montevideo units, are insufficiently rigorous for the performance of cesarean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11576566     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01516-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  Queueing theoretic analysis of labor and delivery : Understanding management styles and C-section rates.

Authors:  Matthew Gombolay; Toni Golen; Neel Shah; Julie Shah
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2017-09-04

2.  Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index.

Authors:  Michelle A Kominiarek; Jun Zhang; Paul Vanveldhuisen; James Troendle; Julie Beaver; Judith U Hibbard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Changes in labor patterns over 50 years.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Julie Beaver; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  The Pathophysiology of Labor Dystocia: Theme with Variations.

Authors:  Katherine Kissler; K Joseph Hurt
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Defining an abnormal first stage of labor based on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Aaron B Caughey; Kimberly A Roehl; Anthony O Odibo; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Perinatal outcomes in the setting of active phase arrest of labor.

Authors:  Dana E M Henry; Yvonne W Cheng; Brian L Shaffer; Anjali J Kaimal; Katherine Bianco; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Charles Kaboré; Valéry Ridde; Séni Kouanda; Ludovic Queuille; Paul-André Somé; Isabelle Agier; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Aspects of Pelvic Floor Protection in Spontaneous Delivery - a Review.

Authors:  Markus Hübner; Christiane Rothe; Claudia Plappert; Kaven Baeßler
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 9.  Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Sarah Munro; Devon Greyson; Mechthild M Gross; Vanora Hundley; Helen Spiby; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  The expected labor progression after labor augmentation with oxytocin: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; James Troendle; D Ware Branch; Matthew Hoffman; Jun Yu; Lixia Zhou; Tao Duan; Jun Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.