K Engelhard1, C Werner, O Möllenberg, E Kochs. 1. Klinik für Anaesthesiologie der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. k.engelhard@lrz.tu-muenchen.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigates the effects of remifentanil and propofol in comparison to isoflurane on dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation in humans. METHODS: In 16 awake patientsdynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation was measured using transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). Thereafter patients were intubated, ventilated with O2/air (FiO2=0.33) and randomly assigned to one of the following anesthetic protocols: group 1 (n=8): 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) remifentanil combined with a propofol-target plasma concentration of 1.5 microg x ml(-1) group 2 (n=8): 1.8 % isoflurane (1.5 MAC). Following 20 min of equilibration the autoregulatory challenge was repeated. Arterial blood gases and body temperature were maintained constant over time. STATISTICS: Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS:Dynamic autoregulation was intact in all patients prior to induction of anesthesia expressed by an autoregulatory index (ARI) of 5.4+/-1.21 (mean+/-SD, group 1) and 5.9+/-0.98 (mean+/-SD, group 2). With remifentanil/propofol anesthesia dynamic autoregulation was similar to the awake state (group 1: ARI=4.9+/-0.88). In contrast, autoregulatory response was delayed with 1.5 MAC isoflurane (group 2, ARI=2.1+/-0.92) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: These data show that dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation is maintained with remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia. This is consistent with the view that narcotics (and hypnotics) do not alter the physiologic cerebrovascular responses to changes in MAP. In contrast, 1.5 MAC isofluranedelays cerebrovascular autoregulation compared to the awake state.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study investigates the effects of remifentanil and propofol in comparison to isoflurane on dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation in humans. METHODS: In 16 awake patients dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation was measured using transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD). Thereafter patients were intubated, ventilated with O2/air (FiO2=0.33) and randomly assigned to one of the following anesthetic protocols: group 1 (n=8): 0.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) remifentanil combined with a propofol-target plasma concentration of 1.5 microg x ml(-1) group 2 (n=8): 1.8 % isoflurane (1.5 MAC). Following 20 min of equilibration the autoregulatory challenge was repeated. Arterial blood gases and body temperature were maintained constant over time. STATISTICS: Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Dynamic autoregulation was intact in all patients prior to induction of anesthesia expressed by an autoregulatory index (ARI) of 5.4+/-1.21 (mean+/-SD, group 1) and 5.9+/-0.98 (mean+/-SD, group 2). With remifentanil/propofol anesthesia dynamic autoregulation was similar to the awake state (group 1: ARI=4.9+/-0.88). In contrast, autoregulatory response was delayed with 1.5 MAC isoflurane (group 2, ARI=2.1+/-0.92) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: These data show that dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation is maintained with remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia. This is consistent with the view that narcotics (and hypnotics) do not alter the physiologic cerebrovascular responses to changes in MAP. In contrast, 1.5 MAC isoflurane delays cerebrovascular autoregulation compared to the awake state.
Authors: Johann Fontana; Julius Moratin; Gregory Ehrlich; Johann Scharf; Christel Weiß; Kirsten Schmieder; Martin Barth Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Marlon Schwarz; Giovanni Rivera; Mary Hammond; Zmira Silman; Kirk Jackson; W Andrew Kofke Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Patrick Schramm; Klaus Ulrich Klein; Lena Falkenberg; Manfred Berres; Dorothea Closhen; Konrad J Werhahn; Matthias David; Christian Werner; Kristin Engelhard Journal: Crit Care Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Mai Louise Grandsgaard Mikkelsen; Rikard Ambrus; James Edward Miles; Helle Harding Poulsen; Finn Borgbjerg Moltke; Thomas Eriksen Journal: Acta Vet Scand Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 1.695