Literature DB >> 12595982

The effect of infusions of adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine on cerebral autoregulation under propofol anaesthesia in an ovine model.

John A Myburgh1, Richard N Upton, Cliff Grant, Allison Martinez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of infusions of adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine on cerebral autoregulation under steady-state propofol anaesthesia with the awake state.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, interventional animal study.
SETTING: University laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Six studies in two cohorts of adult ewes: awake and steady-state propofol anaesthesia (15 mg/min).
INTERVENTIONS: In random order, each animal received ramped infusions of adrenaline, noradrenaline (0-40 microg/min) and dopamine (0-40 microg/kg per min). MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured continuously from changes in Doppler velocities in the sagittal sinus and normalised to a PaCO(2) 35 mmHg. Propofol decreased CBF by 55% relative to pre-anaesthesia values (p=0.0001). All three catecholamines significantly and equivalently increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline in a dose-dependent manner in both awake and propofol cohorts. Adrenaline significantly increased CBF from baseline in both awake sheep (p<0.01) and during propofol anaesthesia (p<0.001); noradrenaline and dopamine did not statistically increase CBF. When comparing the effects of individual catecholamines with each other within each cohort, no statistically significant difference between the catecholamines was demonstrated. (p>0.05). Using linear regression analysis, normalised CBF was correlated against associated changes in MAP. No significant differences were demonstrated between the slopes of regression lines for adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine in either cohort (ANCOVA). There was a statistically significant difference between the intercepts of the awake and propofol cohorts (p<0.0001), but no difference between the slopes (p=0.69).
CONCLUSIONS: Over a specific dose range, catecholamine-induced hypertension caused increased CBF during steady-state propofol anaesthesia. This effect was offset by an associated reduction in CBF caused by propofol. The concomitant administration of propofol and catecholamines was not associated with altered autoregulatory function compared to the awake state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12595982     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1684-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  32 in total

Review 1.  Regional pharmacokinetics. III. Modelling methods.

Authors:  R N Upton; W B Runciman; L E Mather
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.627

2.  Characterization of cerebral hemodynamic phases following severe head trauma: hypoperfusion, hyperemia, and vasospasm.

Authors:  N A Martin; R V Patwardhan; M J Alexander; C Z Africk; J H Lee; E Shalmon; D A Hovda; D P Becker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  A role of the central catecholamine neuron in cerebral circulation.

Authors:  H Yokote; T Itakura; K Nakai; I Kamei; H Imai; N Komai
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Xenon 133--CBF measurements in severe head injury and subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  J Meixensberger
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1993

5.  An ultrasonic Doppler venous outflow method for the continuous measurement of cerebral blood flow in conscious sheep.

Authors:  R Upton; C Grant; G Ludbrook
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  S(+)-ketamine/propofol maintain dynamic cerebrovascular autoregulation in humans.

Authors:  K Engelhard; C Werner; O Möllenberg; E Kochs
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Unexpected neurotoxicity of etoposide phosphate administered in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents after blood-brain barrier modification to enhance delivery, using propofol for general anesthesia, in a rat model.

Authors:  D Fortin; C I McCormick; L G Remsen; R Nixon; E A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Cerebrovascular pressure transmission analysis as a guide to the pathophysiology of raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  S B Lewis
Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.557

9.  Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane, and propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  S Strebel; A M Lam; B Matta; T S Mayberg; R Aaslid; D W Newell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  The cerebrovascular effects of adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine infusions under propofol and isoflurane anaesthesia in sheep.

Authors:  J A Myburgh; R N Upton; C Grant; A Martinez
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.669

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Year in review in intensive care medicine-2003. Part 3: intensive care unit organization, scoring, quality of life, ethics, neonatal and pediatrics, and experimental.

Authors:  Edward Abraham; Peter Andrews; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Marco Ranieri; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Continuous cerebral autoregulation monitoring by improved cross-correlation analysis: comparison with the cuff deflation test.

Authors:  Melanie Christ; Frank Noack; Tobias Schroeder; Andreas Hagmueller; Rainer Koch; Sven-Axel May; Ute Morgenstern; Maximilian Ragaller; Ralf Steinmeier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-12-02       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Effects of dobutamine and phenylephrine on cerebral perfusion in patients undergoing cerebral bypass surgery: a randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Annemarie Akkermans; Judith A R van Waes; Tristan P C van Doormaal; Eric E C de Waal; Gabriël J E Rinkel; Albert van der Zwan; Cor J Kalkman; Wilton A van Klei
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 9.166

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.