Literature DB >> 11572360

Melody recognition using three types of dichotic-pitch stimulus.

M A Akeroyd1, B C Moore, G A Moore.   

Abstract

The recognition of 10 different 16-note melodies, constructed using either dichotic-pitch stimuli or diotic pure-tone stimuli, was measured. The dichotic pitches were created by placing a frequency-dependent transition in the interaural phase of a noise burst. Three different configurations for the transition were used in order to give Huggins pitch, binaural-edge pitch, and binaural-coherence-edge pitch. Forty-nine inexperienced listeners participated. The melodies evoked by the dichotic stimuli were consistently identified well in the first block of trials, indicating that the sensation of dichotic pitch was relatively immediate and did not require prolonged listening experience. There were only small improvements across blocks of trials. The mean scores were 97% (pure tones), 93% (Huggins pitch), 89% (binaural-edge pitch), and 77% (binaural-coherence-edge pitch). All pairwise differences were statistically significant, indicating that Huggins pitch was the most salient of the dichotic pitches and binaural-coherence-edge pitch was weakest. To account for these differences in salience, a simulation of lateral inhibition was applied to the recovered spectrum generated by the modified equalization cancellation model [J. F. Culling, A. Q. Summerfield, and D. H. Marshall, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3509-3526 (1998)]. The height of the peak in the resulting "edge-enhanced" recovered spectrum reflected the relative strength of the different dichotic pitches.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11572360     DOI: 10.1121/1.1390336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Frequency discrimination duration effects for Huggins pitch and narrowband noise (L).

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Martine Turgeon; Stuart Lancaster; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On Zwicker tones and musical pitch in the likely absence of phase locking corresponding to the pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Combination of spectral and binaurally created harmonics in a common central pitch processor.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-18

4.  An online headphone screening test based on dichotic pitch.

Authors:  Alice E Milne; Roberta Bianco; Katarina C Poole; Sijia Zhao; Andrew J Oxenham; Alexander J Billig; Maria Chait
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-12-09

5.  Pitch processing sites in the human auditory brain.

Authors:  Deborah A Hall; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 5.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.