Literature DB >> 11571660

Spinal cord decompression: an endoscopically assisted approach for metastatic tumors.

R F McLain1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The paper describes a technique for complete vertebrectomy and spinal cord decompression, followed by a formal anterior column reconstruction, using endoscopic instruments. This procedure is indicated for patients with radioresistant metastasis of the thoracic spine, particularly those involving the upper thoracic segments where a thoracotomy is difficult and carries a high morbidity, and for patients with pulmonary disease who cannot tolerate a standard thoracotomy. Results in nine consecutive cases are reported.
OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of endoscopically assisted decompression and stabilization through a single, extrapleural, posterolateral approach.
SETTING: The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
METHODS: Posterolateral decompression of the thoracic spinal cord offers potential advantages over traditional combined procedures (anterior thoracotomy and posterior instrumentation), including reduced operative time, decreased morbidity, and reduced hospital stay. Previous studies have not demonstrated the same neurological benefit for posterolateral decompression as for anterior vertebrectomy and decompression, however, Surgical indications, rationale and technique for an improved posterolateral approach, augmented by endoscopic methods, are provided, and initial clinical results are described.
RESULTS: Drawbacks to the traditional posterolateral decompressions have included poor visualization of the spinal cord and anterior tumor, poor access to tumor on the side contralateral to the approach, and the need to manipulate the spinal cord to completely remove both adjacent tumor and tumor adherent to the dura. Transpedicular decompression using endoscopy is described in nine patients. The mean operative time for the combined procedure was 6.0 h, with a mean blood loss of 1677 cc. Neurological recovery and maintenance were excellent. Inpatient days averaged 6.5, and ICU days averaged 1.4. Two patients died of disease eight and 14 months post-op, and seven were living, with disease, 3-36 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopically assisted decompression can reduce morbidity, hospitalization, and treatment costs while matching the efficacy of traditional combined procedures. Endoscopy provides a readily available and easily applied tool that dramatically improves the surgeon's vision, providing light, magnification, and a direct view of remote structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11571660     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  9 in total

Review 1.  Thoracolumbar corpectomy/spondylectomy for spinal metastasis: a pooled analysis comparing the outcome of seven different surgical approaches.

Authors:  Alexander Spiessberger; Varun Arvind; Basil Gruter; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Treatment of spinal epidural compression due to hematological malignancies: a single institution's retrospective experience.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Jérôme Allain; Françoise Roudot-Thoraval; Alexandre Poignard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Circumferential stabilization with ghost screwing after posterior resection of spinal metastases via transpedicular route.

Authors:  Alparslan Senel; Ahmet Hilmi Kaya; Enis Kuruoglu; Fahrettin Celik
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Endoscopic surgical treatment for symptomatic spinal metastases in long-term cancer survivors.

Authors:  Albert E Telfeian; Adetokunbo Oyelese; Jared Fridley; Cody Doberstein; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

5.  Case report: Curetting osteoid osteoma of the spine using combined video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and navigation.

Authors:  Wuilker Knoner Campos; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Complications in the management of metastatic spinal disease.

Authors:  Eilis Catherine Dunning; Joseph Simon Butler; Seamus Morris
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

7.  Minimally invasive surgical approaches in the management of tuberculosis of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Nitin Garg; Renuka Vohra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A systematic review of the current role of minimally invasive spine surgery in the management of metastatic spine disease.

Authors:  Camilo A Molina; Ziya L Gokaslan; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-02

Review 9.  When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease.

Authors:  Scott L Zuckerman; Ilya Laufer; Arjun Sahgal; Yoshiya J Yamada; Meic H Schmidt; Dean Chou; John H Shin; Naresh Kumar; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.