AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in detecting acetabular labral lesions in correlation to surgical findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients (40 hips) with chronic hip pain and a strong clinical suspicion of labral lesions were examined with MRI in the coronal and axial plane by obtaining T1 weighted and proton density-weighted spin echo sequences. Additionally, MR arthrography of the hip joint in the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique plane was performed by obtaining T1-weighted three-dimensional gradientecho sequences after the intraarticular injection of gadopentate dimeglumine. The labra were prospectively evaluated on the basis of morphology, signal intensity, the presence or absence of a tear, and their attachment to the acetabulum. All patients underwent surgery, and the MRI findings and MR arthrography findings were compared with the surgical results. RESULTS: Surgically, 34 labral lesions, and 6 normal labra were detected. MRI correctly depicted labral lesions in 24 patients and two normal labra, and MR arthrography correctly depicted labral lesions in 30 patients and 5 normal labra compared with the surgical results. The sensitivity of MRI was 80%, the accuracy of MRI was 65%, the sensitivity of MR arthrography was 95%, and the accuracy of MR arthrography was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: MR arthrography enables considerably more accurate detection of acetabular labral lesions than MRI. MR arthrography should be the method of choice for the diagnosis of the presence or absence of acetabular labral lesions in patients with chronic hip pain and a strong clinical suspicion of labral lesions.
AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in detecting acetabular labral lesions in correlation to surgical findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients (40 hips) with chronic hip pain and a strong clinical suspicion of labral lesions were examined with MRI in the coronal and axial plane by obtaining T1 weighted and proton density-weighted spin echo sequences. Additionally, MR arthrography of the hip joint in the coronal oblique and sagittal oblique plane was performed by obtaining T1-weighted three-dimensional gradientecho sequences after the intraarticular injection of gadopentate dimeglumine. The labra were prospectively evaluated on the basis of morphology, signal intensity, the presence or absence of a tear, and their attachment to the acetabulum. All patients underwent surgery, and the MRI findings and MR arthrography findings were compared with the surgical results. RESULTS: Surgically, 34 labral lesions, and 6 normal labra were detected. MRI correctly depicted labral lesions in 24 patients and two normal labra, and MR arthrography correctly depicted labral lesions in 30 patients and 5 normal labra compared with the surgical results. The sensitivity of MRI was 80%, the accuracy of MRI was 65%, the sensitivity of MR arthrography was 95%, and the accuracy of MR arthrography was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: MR arthrography enables considerably more accurate detection of acetabular labral lesions than MRI. MR arthrography should be the method of choice for the diagnosis of the presence or absence of acetabular labral lesions in patients with chronic hip pain and a strong clinical suspicion of labral lesions.