Literature DB >> 11568785

One or two hours postprandial glucose measurements: are they the same?

E Sivan1, B Weisz, C J Homko, E A Reece, E Schiff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the rate of abnormal glucose levels measured after 1 hour (>140 mg%) with those measured after 2 hours (>120 mg%) postprandially in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). STUDY
DESIGN: Sixty-eight women were included in this study. All had GDM based on the criteria of Carpenter-Coustan. Women with fasting glucose levels of 105 mg% or more were excluded from the study. All women were initially treated by diet. All women measured daily capillary blood glucose levels when fasting as well as 1 hour and 2 hours postprandially for 1 week, immediately after diagnosis of GDM. Glucose levels were obtained by memory-based glucometers. All women were followed in a specialized gestational-diabetes clinic throughout the pregnancy. Insulin therapy was started on an individual basis according to common clinical criteria. Epidemiologic and perinatal data were collected from medical charts.
RESULTS: The average age of the women was 30.8 +/- 5.4 years. Thirty-five percent of participants were primipara. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 28.8 +/- 5.4 weeks. Glucose measurements included 618 readings during fasting and 2730 either 1 hour or 2 hours postprandial. Rates of abnormal glucose (>95 mg% when fasting; >140 mg% 1 hour or >120 mg% 2 hours after each meal) per person were the following: fasting, 27.1% abnormal glucose measurements; postbreakfast, 22.4% abnormal levels after 1 and 8.5% after 2 hours (P < .01); postlunch, 16.4% abnormal levels after 1 hour and 18.2% after 2 hours (not significant); postdinner, 16.3% abnormal levels after 1 hour and 30.1% after 2 hours (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: The rate of abnormal values was 2.5-fold greater 1 hour postbreakfast than 2 hours postbreakfast, in contrast to an opposite ratio of a 2-fold increase in the rate of abnormal values 2 hours postdinner versus 1 hour postdinner. Therefore, differential measurement (1 hour after breakfast and 2 hours after dinner) might impose stricter criteria for controlling blood glucose levels. Further clinical research should explore whether differential measurements might reduce the rate of diabetes-associated complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568785     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.117184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  Glycemic targets in pregnancies affected by diabetes: historical perspective and future directions.

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Glucose Targets and Insulin Choice in Pregnancy: What Has Changed in the Last Decade?

Authors:  Siobhán Bacon; Denice S Feig
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Current controversies in the mechanisms and treatment of gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Gyula Tamás; Zsuzsa Kerényi
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Third trimester glycemic profiles and fetal growth.

Authors:  Gustavo Leguizamón; Francisco von Stecher
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Comparison of postprandial 90th-minute plasma glucose level with 60th- and 120th-minute levels in patients with gestational diabetes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ozge Sever; Kemal Sarsmaz; A S Ozgu-Erdinc; Aykan Yucel
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  One-hour versus two-hour postprandial blood glucose measurement in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: which is more predictive?

Authors:  A Seval Ozgu-Erdinc; Cantekin Iskender; Dilek Uygur; Aysegul Oksuzoglu; K Doga Seckin; M Ilkin Yeral; Zeynep I Kalaylioglu; Aykan Yucel; A Nuri Danisman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 7.  A standard approach to continuous glucose monitor data in pregnancy for the study of fetal growth and infant outcomes.

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez; Linda A Barbour
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 8.  Patterns of glycemia in normal pregnancy: should the current therapeutic targets be challenged?

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez; Jacob E Friedman; Rachael E Van Pelt; Linda A Barbour
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 19.112

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.