Literature DB >> 11566318

A framework for studying the neural basis of attention.

C Frith1.   

Abstract

There is a high degree of consensus between the contributors to this volume on the neural correlates of attention. This agreement relates both to the implicit framework the authors apply to their studies of attention and also to the brain regions that are implicated. In this epilogue I will attempt to make explicit the framework that is used and will explore the assumptions that underlie the rules used for identifying the sites of attentional modulation and the sources of the modulatory signals. These assumptions have proved very useful, but most still require further investigation. The distinction between bottom-up and top-down processes is a key components of the framework, but is also a potential source of confusion. It seems that bottom-up processing, in the psychological sense of not being under voluntary control, can involve top-down processes in the physiological sense of involving the feedback of neural signals.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566318     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00124-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Multiple identity tracking strategies vary by age: An ERP study.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Audrey Duarte; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Characterization of Source-Localized EEG Activity During Sustained Deep-Tissue Pain.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Völker; Federico Gabriel Arguissain; José Biurrun Manresa; Ole Kæseler Andersen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Deficits in attentional control: cholinergic mechanisms and circuitry-based treatment approaches.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Giovanna Paolone
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Working memory load modulation of parieto-frontal connections: evidence from dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  Liangsuo Ma; Joel L Steinberg; Khader M Hasan; Ponnada A Narayana; Larry A Kramer; F Gerard Moeller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Top-down modulation of visual feature processing: the role of the inferior frontal junction.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Michael T Rubens; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neural suppression of irrelevant information underlies optimal working memory performance.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Predictive knowledge of stimulus relevance does not influence top-down suppression of irrelevant information in older adults.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Kelly Hennigan; Mattias Ostberg; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  A cognitive framework for understanding and improving interference resolution in the brain.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Joaquin A Anguera; David A Ziegler; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Cardiorespiratory fitness and attentional control in the aging brain.

Authors:  Ruchika Shaurya Prakash; Michelle W Voss; Kirk I Erickson; Jason M Lewis; Laura Chaddock; Edward Malkowski; Heloisa Alves; Jennifer Kim; Amanda Szabo; Siobhan M White; Thomas R Wójcicki; Emily L Klamm; Edward McAuley; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Hemispheric differences in frontal and parietal influences on human occipital cortex: direct confirmation with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Christian C Ruff; Felix Blankenburg; Otto Bjoertomt; Sven Bestmann; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Jon Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.