Literature DB >> 11566311

Dissociating top-down attentional control from selective perception and action.

J B Hopfinger1, M G Woldorff, E M Fletcher, G R Mangun.   

Abstract

Research into the neural mechanisms of attention has revealed a complex network of brain regions that are involved in the execution of attention-demanding tasks. Recent advances in human neuroimaging now permit investigation of the elementary processes of attention being subserved by specific components of the brain's attention system. Here we describe recent studies of spatial selective attention that made use of positron emission tomography (PET), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to investigate the spatio-temporal dynamics of the attention-related neural activity. We first review the results from an event-related fMRI study that examined the neural mechanisms underlying top-down attentional control versus selective sensory perception. These results defined a fronto-temporal-parietal network involved in the control of spatial attention. Activity in these areas biased the neural activity in sensory brain structures coding the spatial locations of upcoming target stimuli, preceding a modulation of subsequent target processing in visual cortex. We then present preliminary evidence from a fast-rate event-related fMRI study of spatial attention that demonstrates how to disentangle the potentially overlapping hemodynamic responses elicited by temporally adjacent stimuli in studies of attentional control. Finally, we present new analyses from combined neuroimaging (PET) and event-related brain potential (ERP) studies that together reveal the timecourse of activation of brain regions implicated in attentional control and selective perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566311     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00117-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  32 in total

1.  Theta frequency band activity and attentional mechanisms in visual and proprioceptive demand.

Authors:  J C Mizelle; Larry Forrester; Mark Hallett; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Listening in silence activates auditory areas: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand; Pierre Fonlupt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Brain potentials distinguish new and studied objects during working memory.

Authors:  Chunyan Guo; Adam L Lawson; Qin Zhang; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Altered prefrontal function with aging: insights into age-associated performance decline.

Authors:  Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Galit Fuhrmann Alpert; Ansgar J Furst; Laura A Hale; Tatsuhide Oga; Sundari Chetty; Natasha Pickard; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans.

Authors:  Ling Li; Caterina Gratton; Dezhong Yao; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  How to Assess Gaming-Induced Benefits on Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Daphne Bavelier; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Games Health J       Date:  2012-06

7.  Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors.

Authors:  Stacia R Friedman-Hill; Lynn C Robertson; Robert Desimone; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Executive function and attention are preserved in older surgically menopausal monkeys receiving estrogen or estrogen plus progesterone.

Authors:  Mary Lou Voytko; Rhonda Murray; Casey J Higgs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effects of two years of conjugated equine estrogens on cholinergic neurons in young and middle-aged ovariectomized monkeys.

Authors:  Carole Browne; Joseph R Tobin; Mary Lou Voytko
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Spatial attention evokes similar activation patterns for visual and auditory stimuli.

Authors:  David V Smith; Ben Davis; Kathy Niu; Eric W Healy; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson; Paul S Morgan; Chris Rorden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.