Literature DB >> 11566230

Effects of humic substances on fluorometric DNA quantification and DNA hybridization.

D S Bachoon1, E Otero, R E Hodson.   

Abstract

DNA extracts from sediment and water samples are often contaminated with coextracted humic-like impurities. Estuarine humic substances and vascular plant extract were used to evaluate the effect of the presence of such impurities on DNA hybridization and quantification. The presence of humic substances and vascular plant extract interfered with the fluorometric measurement of DNA concentration using Hoechst dye H33258 and PicoGreen reagent. Quantification of DNA amended with humic substances (20-80 ng/microl) using the Hoechst dye assay was more reliable than with PicoGreen reagent. A simple procedure was developed to improve the accuracy for determining the DNA concentration in the presence of humic substances. In samples containing up to 80 ng/microl of humic acids, the fluorescence of the samples were measured twice: first without Hoechst dye to ascertain any fluorescence from impurities in the DNA sample, followed with Hoechst dye addition to obtain the total sample fluorescence. The fluorescence of the Hoechst dye-DNA complex was calculated by subtracting the fluorescence of the impurities from the fluorescence of the sample. Vascular plant extract and humic substances reduced the binding of DNA onto the nylon membrane. Low amounts (<2.0 microg) of humic substances derived from estuarine waters did not affect the binding of 100 ng of target DNA to nylon membranes. DNA samples containing 1.0 microg of humic substances performed well in DNA hybridizations with DIG-labeled oliogonucleotide and chromosomal probes. Therefore, we suggest that DNA samples containing low concentrations of humic substances (<20 ng/microl) could be used in quantitative membrane hybridization without further purification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566230     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(01)00296-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  8 in total

1.  Mechanisms underlying the impact of humic acids on DNA quantification by SYBR Green I and consequences for the analysis of soils and aquatic sediments.

Authors:  Hubert Zipper; Christiane Buta; Katrin Lämmle; Herwig Brunner; Jürgen Bernhagen; Frank Vitzthum
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Extraction of the metagenomic DNA and assessment of the bacterial diversity from the petroleum-polluted sites.

Authors:  Viral G Akbari; Rupal D Pandya; Satya P Singh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Effects of humic acid on DNA quantification with Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification kit and short tandem repeat amplification efficiency.

Authors:  Seung Bum Seo; Hye Young Lee; Ai Hua Zhang; Hye Yeon Kim; Dong Hoon Shin; Soong Deok Lee
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications.

Authors:  Hubert Zipper; Herwig Brunner; Jürgen Bernhagen; Frank Vitzthum
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The nucleosome (histone-DNA complex) is the TLR9-specific immunostimulatory component of Plasmodium falciparum that activates DCs.

Authors:  Nagaraj M Gowda; Xianzhu Wu; D Channe Gowda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transparent DNA/RNA Co-extraction Workflow Protocol Suitable for Inhibitor-Rich Environmental Samples That Focuses on Complete DNA Removal for Transcriptomic Analyses.

Authors:  Natalie Y N Lim; Constance A Roco; Åsa Frostegård
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  PCR inhibition in qPCR, dPCR and MPS-mechanisms and solutions.

Authors:  Maja Sidstedt; Peter Rådström; Johannes Hedman
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 8.  Extraction of bacterial RNA from soil: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Masahito Hayatsu; Takeshi Fujii
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.