Literature DB >> 11565161

Do not delay: breast cancer and time, 1900-1970.

R A Aronowitz1.   

Abstract

Until the 1960s, the central public health message about breast cancer was that women should not delay seeking medical attention for breast problems. Epidemiological, pathological, public health, and clinical writings, movies, and doctor-patient correspondence are analyzed in order to understand the durability and centrality of this "do not delay" message. Problematic assumptions about the natural history of cancer, the efficacy of surgery, and individual responsibility for disease contributed to the durability of the "do not delay" message. More important, the message catalyzed or sustained changes in the routines of ordinary women, general practitioners, surgeons, and pathologists, which led to the perception that the campaign against cancer was working. Thus a powerful set of reinforcing perceptions and behaviors maintained the centrality of the "do not delay" campaign until the era of mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11565161      PMCID: PMC2751202          DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN: 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  10 in total

Review 1.  The redefinition of aging in American surgery.

Authors:  Mark D Neuman; Charles L Bosk
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Engaging Patients in Decisions About Cancer Screening: Exploring the Decision Journey Through the Use of a Patient Portal.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Alex H Krist; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Resa M Jones; Rebecca R Lehman; Camille J Hochheimer; Roy T Sabo; Dominick L Frosch; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  "Screening" for prostate cancer in New York's skid row: history and implications.

Authors:  Robert Aronowitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  The converged experience of risk and disease.

Authors:  Robert A Aronowitz
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Could screening participation bias symptom interpretation? An interview study on women's interpretations of and responses to cancer symptoms between mammography screening rounds.

Authors:  Marit Solbjør; John-Arne Skolbekken; Ann Rudinow Sætnan; Anne Irene Hagen; Siri Forsmo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Discussing uncertainty and risk in primary care: recommendations of a multi-disciplinary panel regarding communication around prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael Wilkes; Malathi Srinivasan; Galen Cole; Richard Tardif; Lisa C Richardson; Marcus Plescia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  "Cancer as the general population knows it": knowledge, fear, and lay education in 1950s Britain.

Authors:  Elizabeth Toon
Journal:  Bull Hist Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.314

8.  Patient Delay in Accessing Breast Cancer Care in a Sub Saharan African Country: Uganda.

Authors:  Moses Galukande; Florence Mirembe; Henry Wabinga
Journal:  Br J Med Med Res       Date:  2014-05-01

9.  Values in breast cancer screening: an empirical study with Australian experts.

Authors:  Lisa Parker; Lucie Rychetnik; Stacy Carter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Who and when should we screen for prostate cancer? Interviews with key opinion leaders.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Michael Leapman; Peter Carroll; Fritz Schröder; Peter C Albertsen; Dragan Ilic; Michael Barry; Dominick L Frosch; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 8.775

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.