Literature DB >> 11560712

Accessing the user's perspective.

Carol Edwards1, Sophie Staniszewska.   

Abstract

Pressure is increasing on health care providers in the UK to demonstrate that they incorporate the views of users when planning and evaluating services. Most recently this has been seen in the commissioning of the National Patients' Experiences Survey. It is timely therefore to review the progress that has been made in trying to access the user's perspective. The aim of this paper is to assist individual service providers in planning their own strategy of user involvement and evaluation, based on an awareness of the current state of knowledge in this area. It reviews the results of research in the field of patient satisfaction over the last 20 years; summarises the main problems in the area, and suggests ways forward. Three main points emerge: the importance of developing and substantiating theory in this field to support study design; the need to exercise care if using quantitative methods and global satisfaction scores, until the process of evaluation is better understood, and the need to consider how a sensitive user-led agenda can be developed. The paper calls for a pause for reflection on the reason for our inquiry into user opinion, and for careful consideration of how we might best design studies to obtain information to fulfil this inquiry.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11560712     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2000.00267.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  9 in total

1.  Is it Possible to Measure What Truly Matters? The Paradox of Clinical Audit in Developing Continence Service Standards for Older People.

Authors:  Patrick Brown; Jenny Billings; Adrian Wagg; Jonathan Potter
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Involving mental health service users in quality assurance.

Authors:  Jenny Weinstein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis.

Authors:  Samantha L Millar; Mary Chambers; Melanie Giles
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Social desirability in the measuring of patient satisfaction after treatment of coloproctologic disorders: on shortcomings of general bipolar satisfaction scales for quality management.

Authors:  Gerald D Giebel; Norbert Groeben
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  A critical analysis of user satisfaction surveys in addiction services: opioid maintenance treatment as a representative case study.

Authors:  Joan Trujols; Ioseba Iraurgi; Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes; Joan Guàrdia-Olmos
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Ethical dilemmas concerning autonomy when persons with dementia wish to live at home: a qualitative, hermeneutic study.

Authors:  Kari Lislerud Smebye; Marit Kirkevold; Knut Engedal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences With Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data.

Authors:  Hannah Bradwell; Rebecca Baines; Katie J Edwards; Sebastian Stevens; Kate Atkinson; Ellen Wilkinson; Arunangsu Chatterjee; Ray B Jones
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-21

8.  Patient satisfaction with healthcare provided by family doctors: primary dimensions and an attempt at typology.

Authors:  Ludmila Marcinowicz; Slawomir Chlabicz; Ryszard Grebowski
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Critical views on postpartum care expressed by new mothers.

Authors:  Ann Rudman; Ulla Waldenström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.