Literature DB >> 19956495

The surgeon's expertise-outcome relationship in gastric cancer surgery.

Wansik Yu1, Young Kook Yun, Ilwoo Whang, Gyu Seok Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The surgical caseload or duration of practice of a surgeon may influence the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery. This study aimed to clarify the surgical quality provided by specialized gastric cancer surgeons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The postoperative courses of 1,877 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer were retrospectively reviewed. For classification of the surgeon's expertise, the number of yearly resections performed by, and consecutive years of practice of, the surgeons were used. The outcome measures used were the 30-day mortality and long-term survival.
RESULTS: Surgical mortalities of patients who underwent surgery by a specialized surgeon and those by a general surgeon revealed no statistically significant difference. A significant difference in the five-year survival rates was found with surgeons with at least two consecutive years of practice compared to those with less than two years, when 50 or more cases had been conducted per year (63.9% and 59.7%; p=0.0380). In cases of four-years of consecutive practice, the five-year survival rate was significantly improved, even if only 10 cases were performed annually (64.9% and 58.3%; p=0.0023), although the best survival rate was found with surgeons that had performed 50 or more surgeries per year.
CONCLUSION: Improved survival rates, with acceptable surgical mortality, can be achieved for gastric cancer when the surgery is performed by a specialized surgeon. A specialized gastric cancer surgeon can be defined as one who has operated on more than 50 new cases per year, with 2 or more consecutive years of surgical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrectomy; Prognosis; Stomach neoplasms; Surgeon volume

Year:  2005        PMID: 19956495      PMCID: PMC2785411          DOI: 10.4143/crt.2005.37.3.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1598-2998            Impact factor:   4.679


  24 in total

1.  Costs, quality, and the volume of surgical oncology procedures.

Authors:  E Munoz; K Mulloy; J Goldstein; N Tenenbaum; L Wise
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-03

Review 2.  Surgeon-related variability in the outcome of cancer surgery.

Authors:  L P Fielding
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.062

3.  D1 versus D2 dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  P McCulloch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer.

Authors:  R Sainsbury; B Haward; L Rider; C Johnston; C Round
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-05-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; I Songun; J Hermans; M Sasako; K Welvaart; J T Plukker; P van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; C W Taat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-03-25       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients.

Authors:  J V Kelly; F J Hellinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Pancreas cancer resection outcome in American University centers in 1989-1990.

Authors:  S B Edge; R E Schmieg; L K Rosenlof; M C Wilhelm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma. Results of the German Gastric Carcinoma Study 1992.

Authors:  J D Roder; K Böttcher; J R Siewert; R Busch; P Hermanek; H J Meyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Martling; B Cedermark; H Johansson; L E Rutqvist; T Holm
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Prognosis for surgically treated gastric cancer patients is poorer for women than men in all patients under age 50.

Authors:  Y Maehara; A Watanabe; Y Kakeji; Y Emi; S Moriguchi; H Anai; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  The positive impact of surgeon specialization on survival for gastric cancer patients after surgery with curative intent.

Authors:  Yuexiang Liang; Liangliang Wu; Xiaona Wang; Xuewei Ding; Han Liang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Full robot-assisted gastrectomy: surgical technique and preliminary experience from a single center.

Authors:  Yolanda Quijano; Emilio Vicente; Benedetto Ielpo; Hipolito Duran; Eduardo Diaz; Isabel Fabra; Luis Malave; Valentina Ferri; Antonio Ferronetti; Carlos Plaza; Vito D'Andrea; Riccardo Caruso
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-13

Review 3.  Associations of Annual Hospital and Surgeon Volume with Patient Outcomes After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiafu Ji; Leiyu Shi; Xiangji Ying; Xinpu Lu; Fei Shan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Operation time as a simple indicator to predict the overcoming of the learning curve in gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Tae-Han Kim; Keun Won Ryu; Jun Ho Lee; Gyu-Seok Cho; Woo Jin Hyung; Chan-Young Kim; Min-Chan Kim; Seung Wan Ryu; Dong Woo Shin; Hyuk-Joon Lee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 7.701

5.  Are treatment outcomes in gastric cancer associated with either hospital volume or surgeon volume?

Authors:  Yosuke Mukai; Yukinori Kurokawa; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-08-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.