Literature DB >> 11558720

The price of progress: prescription drugs in the health care market.

J D Kleinke1.   

Abstract

Pharmacy costs are rising in excess of general and medical cost inflation, leading to calls for price and utilization controls by public and private payers. Such controls would be ineffective and counterproductive because they would attempt to reverse two profound, historic phenomena at work in the U. S. health care system. The added costs associated with breakthrough medicines represent a major structural shift from the provision of traditional medical services to the consumption of medical products; they also represent the creation of economic, social, and public health utility that we value as a society. The balkanization of medical delivery, institutionalized under traditional reimbursement strategies and galvanized by federal law, does not adequately account for or efficiently accommodate this rotation and increased utility. Federal and state laws regulating health insurance and provider risk sharing need to be revamped to encourage rather than constrain the social progress embodied in expensive, breakthrough medical technologies.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11558720     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of marketing in pharmaceutical research and development.

Authors:  John E Calfee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The role of funding and policies on innovation in cancer drug development.

Authors:  P Kanavos; R Sullivan; G Lewison; W Schurer; S Eckhouse; Z Vlachopioti
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2010-02-03

3.  Entry time effects and follow-on drug competition.

Authors:  Luiz Flavio Andrade; Catherine Sermet; Sylvain Pichetti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-12-12

4.  A comparison of drug formularies and the potential for cost-savings.

Authors:  Andrea L Kjos; Jon C Schommer; Yingli Yuan
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2010-09

5.  The demise of Oregon's Medically Needy program: effects of losing prescription drug coverage.

Authors:  Judy Zerzan; Tina Edlund; Lisa Krois; Jeanene Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  What works and what doesn't work well in the US healthcare system.

Authors:  Harold S Luft
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Age Estimates in the National Health Accounts.

Authors:  Sean P Keehan; Helen C Lazenby; Mark A Zezza; Aaron C Catlin
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004

8.  Development of training for medicines-oriented policymakers to apply evidence.

Authors:  H L Colquhoun; E Helis; D Lowe; D Belanger; S Hill; A Mayhew; M Taylor; J M Grimshaw
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-07-29

9.  Management of sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis with nonoperative care is medical resource-intensive and costly in a United States commercial payer population.

Authors:  Stacey J Ackerman; David W Polly; Tyler Knight; Tim Holt; John Cummings
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-02-11

10.  State and Regional Variation in Prescription- and Payment-Related Promoters of Adherence to Blood Pressure Medication.

Authors:  Peter K Yang; Matthew D Ritchey; Stavros Tsipas; Fleetwood Loustalot; Gregory D Wozniak
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.830

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.