Judy Zerzan1, Tina Edlund, Lisa Krois, Jeanene Smith. 1. Seattle VA Health Services Research and Development, 1100 Olive Way, #1400, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. zerzanj@u.washington.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In January 2003, people covered by Oregon's Medically Needy program lost benefits owing to state budget shortfalls. The Medically Needy program is a federally matched optional Medicaid program. In Oregon, this program mainly provided prescription drug benefits. OBJECTIVE: To describe the Medically Needy population and determine how benefit loss affected this population's health and prescription use. DESIGN: A 49-question telephone survey instrument created by the research team and administered by a research contractor. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 1,269 eligible enrollees in Oregon's Medically Needy Program. Response rate was 35% with 439 individuals, ages 21-91 and 64% women, completing the survey. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, health information, and medication use at the time of the survey obtained from the interview. Medication use during the program obtained from administrative data. RESULTS: In the 6 months after the Medically Needy program ended, 75% had skipped or stopped medications. Sixty percent of the respondents had cut back on their food budget, 47% had borrowed money, and 49% had skipped paying other bills to pay for medications. By self-report, there was no significant difference in emergency department visits, but a significant decrease in hospitalizations comparing 6 months before and after losing the program. Two-thirds of respondents rated their current health as poor or fair. CONCLUSIONS: The Medically Needy program provided coverage for a low-income, chronically ill population. Since its termination, enrollees have decreased prescription drug use and increased financial burden. As states make program changes and Medicare Part D evolves, effects on vulnerable populations must be considered.
BACKGROUND: In January 2003, people covered by Oregon's Medically Needy program lost benefits owing to state budget shortfalls. The Medically Needy program is a federally matched optional Medicaid program. In Oregon, this program mainly provided prescription drug benefits. OBJECTIVE: To describe the Medically Needy population and determine how benefit loss affected this population's health and prescription use. DESIGN: A 49-question telephone survey instrument created by the research team and administered by a research contractor. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 1,269 eligible enrollees in Oregon's Medically Needy Program. Response rate was 35% with 439 individuals, ages 21-91 and 64% women, completing the survey. MEASUREMENTS: Demographics, health information, and medication use at the time of the survey obtained from the interview. Medication use during the program obtained from administrative data. RESULTS: In the 6 months after the Medically Needy program ended, 75% had skipped or stopped medications. Sixty percent of the respondents had cut back on their food budget, 47% had borrowed money, and 49% had skipped paying other bills to pay for medications. By self-report, there was no significant difference in emergency department visits, but a significant decrease in hospitalizations comparing 6 months before and after losing the program. Two-thirds of respondents rated their current health as poor or fair. CONCLUSIONS: The Medically Needy program provided coverage for a low-income, chronically ill population. Since its termination, enrollees have decreased prescription drug use and increased financial burden. As states make program changes and Medicare Part D evolves, effects on vulnerable populations must be considered.
Authors: R Tamblyn; R Laprise; J A Hanley; M Abrahamowicz; S Scott; N Mayo; J Hurley; R Grad; E Latimer; R Perreault; P McLeod; A Huang; P Larochelle; L Mallet Journal: JAMA Date: 2001 Jan 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Chien-Wen Tseng; Robert H Brook; Emmett Keeler; W Neil Steers; Beth E Waitzfelder; Carol M Mangione Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Denise M Boudreau; Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone; Jacqueline S Gardner; David K Blough; Susan R Heckbert Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ubolrat Piamjariyakul; Donna Macan Yadrich; Vicki M Ross; Carol E Smith; Faye Clements; Arthur R Williams Journal: Nurs Econ Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.085