Literature DB >> 11557490

Pharmacodynamics of gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

A P MacGowan1, C A Rogers, H A Holt, M Wootton, K E Bowker.   

Abstract

The pharmacodynamics of gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae were investigated in a dilutional pharmacodynamic model of infection. Dose fractionation was used to simulate concentrations of gemifloxacin in human serum associated with 640 mg every 48 h (one dose), 320 mg every 24 h (two doses), and 160 mg every 12 h (four doses). Five strains of S. pneumoniae for which MICs were 0.016, 0.06, 0.1, 0.16, and 0.24 mg/liter were used to assess the antibacterial effect of gemifloxacin. An inoculum of 10(7) to 10(8) CFU/ml was used, and each experiment was performed at least in triplicate. The pharmacodynamic parameters (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]/MIC, maximum concentration of drug in serum [C(max)]/MIC, and the time that the serum drug concentration remains higher than the MIC [T > MIC]) were related to antibacterial effect as measured by the area under the bacterial-kill curve from 0 to 48 h (AUBKC(48)) using an inhibitory sigmoid E(max) model. Weighted least-squares regression was used to predict the effect of the pharmacodynamic parameters on AUBKC(48), and Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to predict the effect of the three pharmacodynamic parameters on the time needed to kill 99.9% of the starting inoculum (T99.9). There was a clear relationship between strain susceptibility and clearance from the model. The simulations (160 mg every 12 h) were associated with slower initial clearance than were the other simulations; in contrast, bacterial regrowth occurred with the 640-mg simulation when MICs were > or =0.1 mg/liter. The percentage coefficient of variance was 19% for AUBKC(48), and the inhibitory sigmoid E(max) model best fit the relationship between AUBKC(48) and AUC/MIC. C(max)/MIC and T > MIC fit less well. The maximum response occurred at an AUC/MIC of >300 to 400. In weighted least-squares regression analysis, there was no evidence that C(max)/MIC was predictive of AUBKC(48), but both AUC/MIC and T > MIC were. A repeat analysis using only data for which the T > MIC was >75% and for which hence regrowth was minimized indicated that AUC/MIC alone was predictive of AUBKC(48). Initial univariate analysis indicated that all three pharmacodynamic parameters were predictive of T99.9, but in the multivariate model only C(max)/MIC reached significance. These data indicate that gemifloxacin is an effective antipneumococcal agent and that AUC/MIC is the best predictor of antibacterial effect as measured by AUBKC(48). However, C(max)/MIC is the best predictor of speed of kill, as measured by T99.9. T > MIC also has a role in determining AUBKC(48), especially when the dose spacing is considerable. Once-daily dosing seems most suitable for gemifloxacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11557490      PMCID: PMC90752          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2916-2921.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

1.  Assessment of different antibacterial effect measures used in in vitro models of infection and subsequent use in pharmacodynamic correlations for moxifloxacin.

Authors:  A MacGowan; C Rogers; H A Holt; M Wootton; K Bowker
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Comparison of in-vitro pharmacodynamics of once and twice daily ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  K E Bowker; M Wootton; C A Rogers; R Lewis; H A Holt; A P MacGowan
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Antipneumococcal activities of gemifloxacin compared to those of nine other agents.

Authors:  T A Davies; L M Kelly; G A Pankuch; K L Credito; M R Jacobs; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A guide to sensitivity testing. Report of the Working Party on Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Comparative in vivo activity of gemifloxacin in a rat model of respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  V Berry; R Page; J Satterfield; C Singley; R Straub; G Woodnutt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  Pharmacodynamics to combat resistance.

Authors:  G Woodnutt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Gemifloxacin is effective in experimental pneumococcal meningitis.

Authors:  A Smirnov; A Wellmer; J Gerber; K Maier; S Henne; R Nau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  The in-vitro activity and tentative breakpoint of gemifloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Pharmacodynamics of a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas sepsis.

Authors:  G L Drusano; D E Johnson; M Rosen; H C Standiford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  A Forrest; D E Nix; C H Ballow; T F Goss; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

1.  Expression of lux genes in a clinical isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae: using bioluminescence to monitor gemifloxacin activity.

Authors:  S J Beard; V Salisbury; R J Lewis; J A Sharpe; A P MacGowan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparative study of the mutant prevention concentrations of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and gemifloxacin against pneumococci.

Authors:  Kim Credito; Klaudia Kosowska-Shick; Pamela McGhee; Glenn A Pankuch; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro simulation of in vivo pharmacokinetic model with intravenous administration via flow rate modulation.

Authors:  Yuan-Cheng Chen; Wang Liang; Jia-Li Hu; Gao-Li He; Xiao-Jie Wu; Xiao-Fang Liu; Jing Zhang; Xue-Qian Hu
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance is an important factor in determining the antimicrobial effect of gemifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activities of moxifloxacin against, and emergence of resistance in, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Chris A Rogers; H Alan Holt; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in a murine pneumonia model: peak concentration/MIC versus area under the curve/MIC ratios.

Authors:  F Scaglione; J W Mouton; R Mattina; F Fraschini
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Bactericidal activities of methoxyfluoroquinolones gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin against aerobic and anaerobic respiratory pathogens in serum.

Authors:  Gary E Stein; Sharon Schooley; Kerin L Tyrrell; Diane M Citron; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.