Literature DB >> 11557169

Muscarinic versus nicotinic modulation of a visual task. a pet study using drug probes.

M J Mentis1, T Sunderland, J Lai, C Connolly, J Krasuski, B Levine, J Friz, S Sobti, M Schapiro, S I Rapoport.   

Abstract

Little is known about acetylcholine (ACh) modulation of central visual processing in humans. Receptor densities in visual brain regions are differentially distributed suggesting that receptor subtypes have different functions. Using PET, we have previously described the brain regions activated by a simple pattern-flash stimulus in healthy elderly subjects. To evaluate muscarinic and nicotinic contributions to ACh modulation of visual processing, we scanned elderly subjects watching the pattern-flash stimulus during no drug, during physostigmine augmentation, and during scopolamine antagonism of physostigmine's action. These manipulations of ACh significantly altered regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in brain regions activated by the task. The pattern of rCBF values across drug conditions suggested that muscarinic and nicotinic effects were dissociated. Muscarinic action predominated in striate cortex (Brodmann Area, BA 17) and lateral visual association areas (BA 18, 19), while nicotinic action predominated in the thalamus and inferior parietal regions (BA 39/40). Both muscarinic and nicotinic actions increased rCBF in some regions while decreasing it in others. A parsimonious reconciliation of these results with functional anatomy suggests that muscarinic action modulates visual attribute processing, while nicotinic action modulates arousal and selective attention to the visual task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11557169     DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00264-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  21 in total

Review 1.  Normal genetic variation, cognition, and aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of cholinesterase inhibitors on visual attention in drivers with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Lori A Daiello; Brian R Ott; Elena K Festa; Michael Friedman; Lindsay A Miller; William C Heindel
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.153

4.  Prompt but inefficient: nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention.

Authors:  Signe Vangkilde; Claus Bundesen; Jennifer T Coull
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Cholinergic modulation of cognition: insights from human pharmacological functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Dissociated mean and functional connectivity BOLD signals in visual cortex during eyes closed and fixation.

Authors:  Mark McAvoy; Linda Larson-Prior; Marek Ludwikow; Dongyang Zhang; Abraham Z Snyder; Debra L Gusnard; Marcus E Raichle; Giovanni d'Avossa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Imaging signal transduction via arachidonic acid in the human brain during visual stimulation, by means of positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Giuseppe Esposito; Giampiero Giovacchini; Margaret Der; Jeih-San Liow; Abesh K Bhattacharjee; Kaizong Ma; Peter Herscovitch; Michael Channing; William C Eckelman; Mark Hallett; Richard E Carson; Stanley I Rapoport
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Beyond heritability: neurotransmitter genes differentially modulate visuospatial attention and working memory.

Authors:  Raja Parasuraman; Pamela M Greenwood; Reshma Kumar; John Fossella
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

9.  Neurogenetic effects on cognition in aging brains: a window of opportunity for intervention?

Authors:  Ivar Reinvang; Ian J Deary; Anders M Fjell; Vidar M Steen; Thomas Espeseth; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Cholinergic enhancement reduces spatial spread of visual responses in human early visual cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Silver; Amitai Shenhav; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.