Literature DB >> 11557152

Classical swine fever (CSF) marker vaccine. Trial II. Challenge study in pregnant sows.

K R Depner1, A Bouma, F Koenen, D Klinkenberg, E Lange, H de Smit, H Vanderhallen.   

Abstract

The efficacy of two marker vaccines against classical swine fever (CSF) was tested in a large scale laboratory trial in several National Swine Fever Laboratories (NSFL) of the EU member states. The vaccines were: BAYOVAC CSF Marker (Vaccine A) from Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany and PORCILIS PESTI (Vaccine B) from Intervet, Boxmeer, The Netherlands. At the NSFL of Belgium, The Netherlands and Germany experiments were carried out to examine the ability of the vaccines to prevent transplacental transmission of CSF virus. In Belgium and The Netherlands pregnant sows were vaccinated once and challenged with virulent CSF virus 14 days later, which was around day 60 of gestation. At the NSFL in Germany sows were vaccinated twice, on days 25 and 46 of pregnancy and were challenged fourteen days after booster vaccination (day 60 of gestation). Apart from minor inflammatory reactions in some sows, no reactions post vaccination were noticed in either vaccine group. Sows vaccinated with Vaccine A were better protected against clinical CSF than sows vaccinated with Vaccine B. The antibody response after vaccination with Vaccine A was more pronounced than after vaccination with Vaccine B. After single vaccination six out of eight sows vaccinated with Vaccine A and all eight sows vaccinated with Vaccine B had viraemic piglets. After double vaccination one out of four litters from sows vaccinated with Vaccine A and four out of five litters from sows vaccinated with Vaccine B were found to be viraemic. However, both vaccines reduced the transmission probability significantly (Vaccine A: P=0.004, Vaccine B: P=0.024) after booster vaccination. However, Vaccine A appeared in this regard more potent as the estimated probability of fetal infections was lower. Nevertheless the risk of virus spreading after vaccination via transplacental transmission is still present and has to be addressed from an epidemiological point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11557152     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(01)00410-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; José Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Liisa Helena Sihvonen; Hans Spoolder; Karl Ståhl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Simon Gubbins; Jan Arend Stegeman; Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou; Inma Aznar; Alessandro Broglia; Eliana Lima; Yves Van der Stede; Gabriele Zancanaro; Helen Clare Roberts
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-07-21

2.  A Novel E2 Glycoprotein Subunit Marker Vaccine Produced in Plant Is Able to Prevent Classical Swine Fever Virus Vertical Transmission after Double Vaccination.

Authors:  Youngmin Park; Yeonsu Oh; Miaomiao Wang; Llilianne Ganges; José Alejandro Bohórquez; Soohong Park; Sungmin Gu; Jungae Park; Sangmin Lee; Jongkook Kim; Eunju Sohn
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

3.  Challenge of pigs with classical swine fever viruses after C-strain vaccination reveals remarkably rapid protection and insights into early immunity.

Authors:  Simon P Graham; Helen E Everett; Felicity J Haines; Helen L Johns; Olubukola A Sosan; Francisco J Salguero; Derek J Clifford; Falko Steinbach; Trevor W Drew; Helen R Crooke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Vaccines for viral and parasitic diseases produced with baculovirus vectors.

Authors:  Monique M van Oers
Journal:  Adv Virus Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.937

Review 5.  Novel Vaccine Technologies in Veterinary Medicine: A Herald to Human Medicine Vaccines.

Authors:  Virginia Aida; Vasilis C Pliasas; Peter J Neasham; J Fletcher North; Kirklin L McWhorter; Sheniqua R Glover; Constantinos S Kyriakis
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Generation and efficacy evaluation of recombinant classical swine fever virus E2 glycoprotein expressed in stable transgenic mammalian cell line.

Authors:  Rong-Hong Hua; Hong Huo; Ye-Nan Li; Yao Xue; Xiao-Lei Wang; Li-Ping Guo; Bin Zhou; Yong Song; Zhi-Gao Bu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pigs immunized with a novel E2 subunit vaccine are protected from subgenotype heterologous classical swine fever virus challenge.

Authors:  Rachel Madera; Wenjie Gong; Lihua Wang; Yulia Burakova; Karen Lleellish; Amy Galliher-Beckley; Jerome Nietfeld; Jamie Henningson; Kaimin Jia; Ping Li; Jianfa Bai; John Schlup; Scott McVey; Changchun Tu; Jishu Shi
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  Controlling of CSFV in European wild boar using oral vaccination: a review.

Authors:  Sophie Rossi; Christoph Staubach; Sandra Blome; Vittorio Guberti; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Ad Vos; Frank Koenen; Marie-Frédérique Le Potier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Julia Henke; Jolene Carlson; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  The potential efficacy of the E2-subunit vaccine to protect pigs against different genotypes of classical swine fever virus circulating in Vietnam.

Authors:  Ha Thi Thanh Tran; Duc Anh Truong; Viet Duc Ly; Hao Thi Vu; Tuan Van Hoang; Chinh Thi Nguyen; Nhu Thi Chu; Vinh The Nguyen; Duyen Thuy Nguyen; Kohtaro Miyazawa; Takehiro Kokuho; Hoang Vu Dang
Journal:  Clin Exp Vaccine Res       Date:  2020-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.