Literature DB >> 34306220

Assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Classical Swine Fever.

Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, José Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Mette Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Pasquali, Liisa Helena Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Karl Ståhl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Simon Gubbins, Jan Arend Stegeman, Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou, Inma Aznar, Alessandro Broglia, Eliana Lima, Yves Van der Stede, Gabriele Zancanaro, Helen Clare Roberts.   

Abstract

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for Classical swine fever (CSF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radii of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, details of the model used for answering these questions are presented in this opinion as well as the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. Here, several recommendations are given on how to increase the effectiveness of some of the sampling procedures. Based on the average length of the period between virus introduction and the reporting of a CSF suspicion, the monitoring period was assessed as non-effective. In a similar way, it was recommended that the length of the measures in the protection and surveillance zones were increased from 15 to 25 days in the protection zone and from 30 to 40 days in the surveillance zone. Finally, the analysis of existing Kernels for CSF suggested that the radius of the protection and the surveillance zones comprise 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to CSF.
© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF; disease control; intervention; monitoring period; protection zone; sampling procedures; surveillance zone

Year:  2021        PMID: 34306220      PMCID: PMC8294054          DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EFSA J        ISSN: 1831-4732


  37 in total

1.  Virulence of classical swine fever virus isolates from Europe and other areas during 1996 until 2007.

Authors:  G Floegel-Niesmann; S Blome; H Gerss-Dülmer; C Bunzenthal; V Moennig
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Situation-based surveillance: adapting investigations to actual epidemic situations.

Authors:  Hans-Hermann Thulke; Dirk Eisinger; Conrad Freuling; Andreas Fröhlich; Anja Globig; Volker Grimm; Thomas Müller; Thomas Selhorst; Christoph Staubach; Stephan Zips
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.535

3.  Descriptive epidemiology of a classical swine fever outbreak in the Limburg Province of Belgium in 1997.

Authors:  K Mintiens; H Deluyker; H Laevens; F Koenen; J Dewulf; A De Kruif
Journal:  J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health       Date:  2001-03

4.  A Simulation Model to Determine Sensitivity and Timeliness of Surveillance Strategies.

Authors:  J Schulz; C Staubach; F J Conraths; K Schulz
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Classical swine fever (CSF) marker vaccine. Trial I. Challenge studies in weaner pigs.

Authors:  A Uttenthal; M F Le Potier; L Romero; G M De Mia; G Floegel-Niesmann
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Quantification of different classical swine fever virus transmission routes within a single compartment.

Authors:  Eefke Weesendorp; Jantien Backer; Willie Loeffen
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  An avirulent chimeric Pestivirus with altered cell tropism protects pigs against lethal infection with classical swine fever virus.

Authors:  Ilona Reimann; Klaus Depner; Sascha Trapp; Martin Beer
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Surveillance strategies for Classical Swine Fever in wild boar - a comprehensive evaluation study to ensure powerful surveillance.

Authors:  Katja Schulz; Marisa Peyre; Christoph Staubach; Birgit Schauer; Jana Schulz; Clémentine Calba; Barbara Häsler; Franz J Conraths
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments.

Authors:  Diane Benford; Thorhallur Halldorsson; Michael John Jeger; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Simon More; Hanspeter Naegeli; Hubert Noteborn; Colin Ockleford; Antonia Ricci; Guido Rychen; Josef R Schlatter; Vittorio Silano; Roland Solecki; Dominique Turck; Maged Younes; Peter Craig; Andrew Hart; Natalie Von Goetz; Kostas Koutsoumanis; Alicja Mortensen; Bernadette Ossendorp; Laura Martino; Caroline Merten; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Anthony Hardy
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2018-01-24

10.  The influence of between-farm distance and farm size on the spread of classical swine fever during the 1997-1998 epidemic in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Gert Jan Boender; Rob van den Hengel; Herman J W van Roermund; Thomas J Hagenaars
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of the control measures of the Category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: prohibitions in restricted zones and risk-mitigating treatments for products of animal origin and other materials.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; José Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde Calvo; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Kris De Clercq; Ylva Sjunnesson; Andrea Gervelmeyer; Helen Clare Roberts
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.