Literature DB >> 11556897

Brain correlates of fast and slow handwriting in humans: a PET-performance correlation analysis.

H R Siebner1, C Limmer, A Peinemann, P Bartenstein, A Drzezga, B Conrad.   

Abstract

The present study examined the cerebral control of velocity during handwriting. We employed H215O positron emission tomography (PET) to measure the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in 10 healthy subjects. Participants were required to write the German verb 'bellen' ('to bark') either at their normal speed (i.e. fast open-loop handwriting) or to write at approximately half of their normal speed without visual feedback. The second task required a continuous modification of the motor output according to the kinaesthetic feedback from the hand (i.e. slow closed-loop handwriting). Pencil movements were recorded during PET scanning and analysed off-line using a stroke-based analysing program. The mean number of inversions in velocity (NIV) per stroke was used to quantify the mode of motor control during each PET scan. A NIV of 1 indicates fast open-loop processing, whereas an increase in NIV reflects a shift towards slow closed-loop processing of handwriting. Foci in the left primary sensorimotor cortex, the right lateral premotor cortex, the left anterior parietal cortex, the left anterior putamen, the left rostral supplementary motor area and the right precuneus showed a graded increase in functional activation with the mean NIV per stroke, suggesting that this set of brain regions is particularly involved in the processing of slow closed-loop writing movements. No area showed a negative relationship between rCBF and the mean NIV per stroke, suggesting that fast open-loop handwriting is achieved by an optimized cooperation of the manual sensorimotor network rather than by a selective activation of a distinct network component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11556897     DOI: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01694.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  14 in total

1.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary A Mayka; Daniel M Corcos; Sue E Leurgans; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The role of dominant striatum in language: a study using intraoperative electrical stimulations.

Authors:  S Gil Robles; P Gatignol; L Capelle; M-C Mitchell; H Duffau
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Approaches to analysis of handwriting as a task of coordinating a redundant motor system.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Frederic Danion; John F Scholz; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  When practice does not make perfect: well-practiced handwriting interferes with the consolidation phase gains in learning a movement sequence.

Authors:  Meirav Balas; Neta Roitenberg; Nir Giladi; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Motor re-training does not need to be task specific to improve writer's cramp.

Authors:  Kirsten E Zeuner; Martin Peller; Arne Knutzen; Mark Hallett; Günther Deuschl; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 10.338

6.  Basal ganglia network mediates the control of movement amplitude.

Authors:  M Desmurget; S T Grafton; P Vindras; H Gréa; R S Turner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  An Analysis of the Brain Systems Involved with Producing Letters by Hand.

Authors:  Sophia Vinci-Booher; Hu Cheng; Karin H James
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A preliminary study of the neuroanatomical correlates of primary writing tremor: role of cerebellum.

Authors:  Ketan Jhunjhunwala; Lija George; Raviteja Kotikalapudi; Pradeep Kumar Gupta; Abhishek Lenka; Albert Stezin; Rajini M Naduthota; Ravi Yadav; Arun Kumar Gupta; Jitender Saini; Pramod Kumar Pal
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Interference to consolidation phase gains in learning a novel movement sequence by handwriting: dependence on laterality and the level of experience with the written sequence.

Authors:  Meirav Balas; Shai Netser; Nir Giladi; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Just watching the game ain't enough: striatal fMRI reward responses to successes and failures in a video game during active and vicarious playing.

Authors:  Jari Kätsyri; Riitta Hari; Niklas Ravaja; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.