Literature DB >> 11556824

Are differences in stage at presentation a credible explanation for reported differences in the survival of patients with colorectal cancer in Europe?

C B Woodman1, A Gibbs, N Scott, N Y Haboubi, S Collins.   

Abstract

Popular reporting of a comparison of cancer survival rates across 17 European countries, based on data collected by national and regional cancer registries, has left an impression of inadequate treatment of patients in the UK. A subsequent study has suggested that the poor survival rates reported for the UK can, in large part, be explained by more advanced stage at presentation. We believe this conclusion to be unsound and use this study as an example to illustrate the methodological difficulties which may arise during such international comparisons. As the NHS cancer plan aspires to achieve for the UK parity with the best cancer care in Europe, careful thought needs to be given to identifying countries with which the UK can usefully compare itself and the most appropriate indicators for this comparison. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11556824      PMCID: PMC2375087          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  5 in total

1.  International differences in survival from colon cancer: more effective care versus less complete cancer registration.

Authors:  P Prior; C B Woodman; S Collins
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Understanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution study.

Authors:  G Gatta; R Capocaccia; M Sant; C M Bell; J W Coebergh; R A Damhuis; J Faivre; C Martinez-Garcia; J Pawlega; M Ponz de Leon; D Pottier; N Raverdy; E M Williams; F Berrino
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Survival of colorectal cancer patients in Europe during the period 1978-1989. EUROCARE Working Group.

Authors:  G Gatta; J Faivre; R Capocaccia; M Ponz de Leon
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Descriptive epidemiology of colorectal cancer in Italy: the 6-year experience of a specialised registry.

Authors:  M Ponz de Leon; R Sassatelli; A Scalmati; C Di Gregorio; R Fante; G Zanghieri; L Roncucci; M Sant; A Micheli
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Variations in the survival of adult cancer patients in Italy.

Authors:  G Gatta; E Buiatti; E Conti; V De Lisi; F Falcini; M Federico; L Gafà; M Ponz de Leon; M Vercelli; R Zanetti
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Lymph node harvests directly influence the staging of colorectal cancer: evidence from a regional audit.

Authors:  D F H Pheby; D F Levine; R W Pitcher; N A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Multilevel latent class casemix modelling: a novel approach to accommodate patient casemix.

Authors:  Mark S Gilthorpe; Wendy J Harrison; Amy Downing; David Forman; Robert M West
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Comparison of cancer survival in UK and Australia: rates are higher in Australia for three major sites.

Authors:  X Q Yu; D L O'Connell; D Forman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.