Literature DB >> 11555248

Secondary predation: quantification of food chain errors in an aphid-spider-carabid system using monoclonal antibodies.

J D Harwood1, S W Phillips, K D Sunderland, W O Symondson.   

Abstract

"Secondary predation" occurs when one predator feeds on a second predator, which has in turn eaten a target prey. Detection of prey remains within predators using monoclonal antibodies cannot distinguish between primary and secondary predation, potentially leading to quantitative and qualitative food chain errors. We report the first fully replicated experiments to measure secondary predation effects, using an aphid-spider-carabid system. Aphids, Sitobion avenae, were fed to spiders, Lepthyphantes tenuis, which were allowed to digest their prey for a range of time intervals. The spiders were then fed to carabids, Poecilus (=Pterostichus) cupreus, which were again allowed to digest their prey for set periods. The anti-aphid monoclonal antibody used to identify S. avenae remains in P. cupreus was one that detected an epitope that increased in availability over the first few hours of digestion, amplifying the signal, extending detection periods and thus increasing the chances of detecting secondary predation. Despite this, and the fact that spiders are known to digest their prey more slowly than many other predators, detection of secondary predation was only possible if the carabids were killed immediately after consuming at least two spiders which were, in turn, eaten immediately after consuming aphids. As this scenario is unlikely to occur frequently in the field it was concluded that secondary predation is unlikely to be a serious source of error during field studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11555248     DOI: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01349.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  9 in total

1.  Detecting predation and scavenging by DNA gut-content analysis: a case study using a soil insect predator-prey system.

Authors:  Anita Juen; Michael Traugott
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Identifying the predator complex of Homalodisca vitripennis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): a comparative study of the efficacy of an ELISA and PCR gut content assay.

Authors:  Valerie Fournier; James Hagler; Kent Daane; Jesse de León; Russell Groves
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Selection of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) specific recombinant monoclonal phage display antibodies for prey detection analysis.

Authors:  César Monzó; Alberto Urbaneja; Miguel Ximénez-Embún; Julia García-Fernández; José Luis García; Pedro Castañera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Metabarcoding dietary analysis of coral dwelling predatory fish demonstrates the minor contribution of coral mutualists to their highly partitioned, generalist diet.

Authors:  Matthieu Leray; Christopher P Meyer; Suzanne C Mills
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Diet assessment of two land planarian species using high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Cristian Cuevas-Caballé; Marta Riutort; Marta Álvarez-Presas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The food web in a subterranean ecosystem is driven by intraguild predation.

Authors:  Andrea Parimuchová; Lenka Petráková Dušátková; Ľubomír Kováč; Táňa Macháčková; Ondřej Slabý; Stano Pekár
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A novel molecular diagnostic method for the gut content analysis of Philaenus DNA.

Authors:  Isabel Rodrigues; Vítor Ramos; Jacinto Benhadi-Marín; Aránzazu Moreno; Alberto Fereres; José Alberto Pereira; Paula Baptista
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effectiveness of annealing blocking primers versus restriction enzymes for characterization of generalist diets: unexpected prey revealed in the gut contents of two coral reef fish species.

Authors:  Matthieu Leray; Natalia Agudelo; Suzanne C Mills; Christopher P Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Detection of predation using qPCR: effect of prey quantity, elapsed time, chaser diet, and sample preservation on detectable quantity of prey DNA.

Authors:  Donald C Weber; Jonathan G Lundgren
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.857

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.