Literature DB >> 11554196

Gaining and maintaining consent: ethical concerns raised in a study of dying patients.

J Lawton1.   

Abstract

This article provides a frank discussion of the practical and ethical issues that emerged during the process of setting up and conducting a participant observation study within an inpatient hospice. A general overview of the participant observation approach is used to prefigure a discussion of its strengths and weaknesses when employed as a research and evaluation tool among palliative care populations. Although participant observation provided a flexible and viable means of collecting data in the hospice, it also created a number of dilemmas that in many cases could not be satisfactorily resolved. Difficulties arose, in particular, with obtaining informed consent from patients and assuming that consent remained valid after patients had deteriorated physically and mentally. Further complications stemmed from the role conflict and ambiguity inherent within an approach that requires a researcher to work simultaneously as a participant and as an observer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Death and Euthanasia

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11554196     DOI: 10.1177/104973201129119389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  10 in total

1.  Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research.

Authors:  Karen Kaiser
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-11

2.  Conducting research interviews with bereaved family carers: when do we ask?

Authors:  Brenda Bentley; Moira O'Connor
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Lessons from the field: challenges in accruing hospice heart failure patients to intervention research.

Authors:  Cheryl H Zambroski; Harleah Buck; Christopher M Garrison; Susan C McMillan
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study.

Authors:  Marilyn Kendall; Fiona Harris; Kirsty Boyd; Aziz Sheikh; Scott A Murray; Duncan Brown; Ian Mallinson; Nora Kearney; Allison Worth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-28

5.  Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.

Authors:  Kristian Pollock
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Ethics of palliative surgery in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Seyed Mahdi Mousavi; Seyed Reza Mousavi; Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

7.  Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end of life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: A mixed methods observational study.

Authors:  Ben Bowers; Kristian Pollock; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.

Authors:  Alicia VandeVusse; Jennifer Mueller; Sebastian Karcher
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 9.  End of life care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of a good death.

Authors:  Anna Spathis; Sara Booth
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2008

10.  Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Hayley Prout; Noreen Hopewell-Kelly; Jessica Baillie; Anthony Byrne; Michelle Edwards; Emily Harrop; Simon Noble; Catherine Sampson; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.568

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.