Literature DB >> 11549618

New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning.

L M Parsons1, D Osherson.   

Abstract

Deductive and probabilistic reasoning are central to cognition but the functional neuroanatomy underlying them is poorly understood. The present study contrasted these two kinds of reasoning via positron emission tomography. Relying on changes in instruction and psychological 'set', deductive versus probabilistic reasoning was induced using identical stimuli. The stimuli were arguments in propositional calculus not readily solved via mental diagrams. Probabilistic reasoning activated mostly left brain areas whereas deductive activated mostly right. Deduction activated areas near right brain homologues of left language areas in middle temporal lobe, inferior frontal cortex and basal ganglia, as well as right amygdala, but not spatial-visual areas. Right hemisphere activations in the deduction task cannot be explained by spill-over from overtaxed, left language areas. Probabilistic reasoning was mostly associated with left hemispheric areas in inferior frontal, posterior cingulate, parahippocampal, medial temporal, and superior and medial prefrontal cortices. The foregoing regions are implicated in recalling and evaluating a range of world knowledge, operations required during probabilistic thought. The findings confirm that deduction and induction are distinct processes, consistent with psychological theories enforcing their partial separation. The results also suggest that, except for statement decoding, deduction is largely independent of language, and that some forms of logical thinking are non-diagrammatic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11549618     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/11.10.954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  30 in total

1.  On the reality of the conjunction fallacy.

Authors:  Ashley Sides; Daniel Osherson; Nicolao Bonini; Riccardo Viale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

2.  How does typicality of category members affect the deductive reasoning? An ERP study.

Authors:  Yi Lei; Fuhong Li; Changquan Long; Peng Li; Qingfei Chen; Yuanyuan Ni; Hong Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task.

Authors:  David Hecht; Vincent Walsh; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The emergence of consequential thought: evidence from neuroscience.

Authors:  Abigail A Baird; Jonathan A Fugelsang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  A cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding causal reasoning and the law.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fugelsang; Kevin N Dunbar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The effect of social content on deductive reasoning: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Nicola Canessa; Alessandra Gorini; Stefano F Cappa; Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini; Massimo Danna; Ferruccio Fazio; Daniela Perani
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning.

Authors:  Magda Osman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

Review 8.  Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

9.  The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference.

Authors:  Martin M Monti; Lawrence M Parsons; Daniel N Osherson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  A neuroscientific approach to normative judgment in law and justice.

Authors:  Oliver R Goodenough; Kristin Prehn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.