Literature DB >> 11547832

COL1A1 Sp1 polymorphism predicts perimenopausal and early postmenopausal spinal bone loss.

H M MacDonald1, F A McGuigan, S A New, M K Campbell, M H Golden, S H Ralston, D M Reid.   

Abstract

Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis but the genes that determine susceptibility to poor bone health are defined incompletely. Previous work has shown that a polymorphism that affects an Spl binding site in the COLIA1 gene is associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of osteoporotic fracture in several populations. Data from cross-sectional studies have indicated that COLIA1 Sp1 alleles also may be associated with increased rates of bone loss with age, but longitudinal studies, which have examined bone loss in relation to COLIA1 genotype, have yielded conflicting results. In this study, we examined the relationship between COLIA1 Sp1 alleles and early postmenopausal bone loss measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a population-based cohort of 734 Scottish women who were followed up over a 5- to 7-year period. The distribution of genotypes was as expected in a white population with 484 "SS" homozygotes (65.9%); 225 "Ss" heterozygotes (30.7%), and 25 "ss" homozygotes (3.4%). Women taking hormone-replacement therapy (HRT; n = 239) had considerably reduced rates of bone loss at the spine (-0.40 +/- 0.06%/year) and hip (-0.56 +/- 0.06%/year) when compared with non-HRT users (n = 352; spine, -1.36 +/- 0.06%/year; hip, -1.21 +/- 0.05%/year; p < 0.001 for both sites). There was no significant difference in baseline BMD values at the lumbar spine (LS) or femoral neck (FN) between genotypes or in the rates of bone loss between genotypes in HRT users. However, in non-HRT users (n = 352), we found that ss homozygotes (n = 12) lost significantly more bone at the lumbar site than the other genotype groups in which ss = -2.26 +/- 0.31%/year compared with SS = -1.38 +/- 0.07%/year and Ss = -1.22 +/- 0.10%/year (p = 0.004; analysis of variance [ANOVA]) and a similar trend was observed at the FN in which ss = -1.78 +/- 0.19%/year compared with SS = -1.21 +/- 0.06%/year and Ss = -1.16 +/- 0.08%/year (p = 0.06; ANOVA). The differences in spine BMD loss remained significant after correcting for confounding factors. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that COLIA1 genotype independently accounted for a further 3.0% of the variation in spine BMD change after age (4.0%), weight (5.0%), and baseline BMD (2.8%). We conclude that women homozygous for the Sp1 polymorphism are at significantly increased risk of excess rates of bone loss at the spine, but this effect may be nullified by the use of HRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547832     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.9.1634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  14 in total

1.  Genetics of the bone response to bisphosphonate treatments.

Authors:  Francesco Massart; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-01

2.  The genetics of response to estrogen treatment.

Authors:  Bente L Langdahl
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-01

3.  Association of PLOD1 polymorphisms with bone mineral density in a population-based study of women from the UK.

Authors:  P N Tasker; H Macdonald; W D Fraser; D M Reid; S H Ralston; O M E Albagha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The genetics of bone loss: challenges and prospects.

Authors:  Braxton D Mitchell; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Postmenopausal osteoporotic fracture-associated COLIA1 variant impacts bone accretion in girls.

Authors:  Diana L Cousminer; Shana E McCormack; Jonathan A Mitchell; Alessandra Chesi; Joseph M Kindler; Andrea Kelly; Benjamin F Voight; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Joan M Lappe; John A Shepherd; Sharon E Oberfield; Vicente Gilsanz; Babette S Zemel; Struan F A Grant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Axial BMD, change in BMD and bone turnover do not predict breast cancer incidence in early postmenopausal women.

Authors:  A Stewart; V Kumar; D J Torgerson; W D Fraser; F J Gilbert; D M Reid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone fragility and collagen cross-links.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Paschalis; Elizabeth Shane; George Lyritis; Grigoris Skarantavos; Richard Mendelsohn; Adele L Boskey
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Genetic determinants of osteoporosis: common bases to cardiovascular diseases?

Authors:  Francesca Marini; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.420

9.  Bone structural effects of variation in the TNFRSF1B gene encoding the tumor necrosis factor receptor 2.

Authors:  B H Mullin; R L Prince; I M Dick; F M A Islam; D J Hart; T D Spector; A Devine; F Dudbridge; S G Wilson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Common variants at the PCOL2 and Sp1 binding sites of the COL1A1 gene and their interactive effect influence bone mineral density in Caucasians.

Authors:  P-Y Liu; Y Lu; J-R Long; F-H Xu; H Shen; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.