Literature DB >> 11547375

The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty.

L M Jazrawi1, B Bai, F J Kummer, R Hiebert, S A Stuchin.   

Abstract

The effect of stem length, diameter, and mode of fixation on the motion and stress transfer of a cemented tibial tray were evaluated for in 12 cadaver knees. There was a significant decrease in motion of the tibial tray with increasing press-fit stem length (75-150 mm) and increasing stem diameter (10-14 mm). Cemented tibial stems showed significantly less tray motion than uncemented stems. The short cemented stems produced tray stability equivalent to long press-fit stems. Although there was a trend for increased proximal tibial stress shielding with the use of cement and longer, wider stems, the trend was not statistically significant. Modular, press-fit stems can achieve tray stability similar to a smaller cemented stem and can avoid the potential problems with cement.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547375     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.25507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Extent of vertical cementing as a predictive factor for radiolucency in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Du Hyun Ro; Yool Cho; Sahnghoon Lee; Kee Yun Chung; Seong Hwan Kim; Young Min Lee; Joon Kyu Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison of cementing techniques of the tibial component in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Tuuli Saari; Ming Guo Li; David Wood; Bo Nivbrant
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changyao Wang; Tilman Pfitzner; Philipp von Roth; Hermann O Mayr; Michael Sostheim; Robert Hube
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Are cementless stems more durable than cemented stems in two-stage revisions of infected total knee arthroplasties?

Authors:  Paul K Edwards; Thomas K Fehring; William G Hamilton; Brett Perricelli; Walter B Beaver; Susan M Odum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does stress shielding occur with the use of long-stem prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Sathappan S Sathappan; Hee-Nee Pang; Alikkal Manoj; Thambayah Ashwin; K Satku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The influence of stem length and fixation on initial femoral component stability in revision total knee replacement.

Authors:  N Conlisk; H Gray; P Pankaj; C R Howie
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Management of tibial bony defect with metal block in primary total knee replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seung-Wook Baek; Chul-Woong Kim; Choong Hyeok Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.