Literature DB >> 11546702

Screening for diabetes in general practice: cross sectional population study.

J M Lawrence1, P Bennett, A Young, A M Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the policy proposed by the American Diabetes Association of universal screening in general practice of all patients aged over 45 years for diabetes.
DESIGN: Cross sectional population study.
SETTING: Local general practice in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged over 45 not known to have diabetes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of diabetes in the screened population, cardiovascular risk profile of patients diagnosed as having diabetes after screening.
RESULTS: Of 2481 patients aged over 45 and not known to have diabetes, 876 attended for screening. There were no significant demographic differences between the screened and unscreened patients. Prevalence of diabetes in patients with age as a sole risk factor was 0.2% (95% confidence interval 0% to 1.4%). Prevalence of diabetes in patients with age and one or more other risk factors (hypertension, obesity, or a family history of diabetes) was 2.8% (1.6% to 4.7%). Four hours a week for a year would be needed to screen all people over 45 in the practice's population; about half this time would be needed to screen patients with risk factors other than age. More than 80% of patients newly diagnosed as having diabetes had a 10 year risk of coronary heart disease >15%, 73% (45% to 92%) were hypertensive, and 73% (45% to 92%) had a cholesterol concentration >5 mmol/l.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening for diabetes in general practice by measuring fasting blood glucose is feasible but has a very low yield in patients whose sole risk factor for diabetes is age over 45. Screening in a low risk population would best be targeted at patients with multiple risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11546702      PMCID: PMC48161          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

Review 1.  Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee criteria.

Authors:  N J Wareham; S J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

2.  Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994.

Authors:  M I Harris; K M Flegal; C C Cowie; M S Eberhardt; D E Goldstein; R R Little; H M Wiedmeyer; D D Byrd-Holt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies. The DECODE-study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  High blood glucose concentration is a risk factor for mortality in middle-aged nondiabetic men. 20-year follow-up in the Whitehall Study, the Paris Prospective Study, and the Helsinki Policemen Study.

Authors:  B Balkau; M Shipley; R J Jarrett; K Pyörälä; M Pyörälä; A Forhan; E Eschwège
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Cardiovascular disease in older adults with glucose disorders: comparison of American Diabetes Association criteria for diabetes mellitus with WHO criteria.

Authors:  J I Barzilay; C F Spiekerman; P W Wahl; L H Kuller; M Cushman; C D Furberg; A Dobs; J F Polak; P J Savage
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-08-21       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. The DECODE study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis Of Diagnostic criteria in Europe.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-08-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Evaluation of fasting plasma glucose as screening test for NIDDM in older adults. Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  B A Blunt; E Barrett-Connor; D L Wingard
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

Authors:  K G Alberti; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a typical English community.

Authors:  W Gatling; A C Houston; R D Hill
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1985-10
View more
  25 in total

1.  Screening for diabetes in general practice. Opportunistic screening for diabetes in general practice is better than nothing.

Authors:  Bertil Hagstrom; Bengt Mattsson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-16

2.  Screening for diabetes using an oral glucose tolerance test within a western multi-ethnic population identifies modifiable cardiovascular risk: the ADDITION-Leicester study.

Authors:  D R Webb; L J Gray; K Khunti; B Srinivasan; N Taub; S Campbell; J Barnett; A Farooqi; J B Echouffo-Tcheugui; S J Griffin; N J Wareham; M J Davies
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Evaluation of a risk factor scoring model in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in China population.

Authors:  Jian-jun Dong; Neng-jun Lou; Jia-jun Zhao; Zhong-wen Zhang; Lu-lu Qiu; Ying Zhou; Lin Liao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 4.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10.

Authors:  W S A Smellie; N Shaw; R Bowley; M F Stewart; A M Kelly; P J Twomey; P R Chadwick; J B Houghton; J P Ng; A J McCulloch
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Yield of opportunistic targeted screening for type 2 diabetes in primary care: the diabscreen study.

Authors:  Erwin P Klein Woolthuis; Wim J C de Grauw; Willem H E M van Gerwen; Henk J M van den Hoogen; Eloy H van de Lisdonk; Job F M Metsemakers; Chris van Weel
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Body size preference among Yoruba in three Nigerian communities.

Authors:  E O Okoro; B A Oyejola; E N Etebu; H Sholagberu; P M Kolo; A Chijioke; S A Adebisi
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.652

7.  High prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in Southern Germany: target populations for efficient screening. The KORA survey 2000.

Authors:  W Rathmann; B Haastert; A Icks; H Löwel; C Meisinger; R Holle; G Giani
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Three generations of autoimmune diabetes: an extended family study.

Authors:  I F Douek; K M Gillespie; R J Dix; P J Bingley; E A M Gale
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Under-prescribing of cardiovascular therapies for diabetes in primary care.

Authors:  K E Bennett; D Williams; J Feely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Noninvasive skin fluorescence spectroscopy is comparable to hemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose for detection of abnormal glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Byron P Olson; Nathaniel I Matter; Marwood N Ediger; Edward L Hull; John D Maynard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.