Literature DB >> 11544430

Effect of cold ischemic time and HLA matching in kidneys coming from "young" and "old" donors: do not leave for tomorrow what you can do tonight.

A Asderakis1, P Dyer, T Augustine, J Worthington, B Campbell, R W Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from older donors are likely to have a lower nephron mass. Nevertheless they constitute a valuable source of kidney allografts. Long cold ischemic time (CIT), with or without delayed graft function (DGF), has been associated with reduced graft survival. The aim of this study was to review the experience of a single UK center to assess the interaction of cold storage time, donor age, organ exchange, and HLA-DR mismatching on short- and long-term survival.
METHODS: We analyzed 788 first cadaver kidney transplants that were performed in our center from 1990 to 1997 and had complete data available. A donor age of 55 years was the cutoff age for "old" and "young" donor kidneys. The primary outcome measured was graft failure from any cause.
RESULTS: There were 132 grafts from donors 55 years or older (16.7%), with 76.8% of the kidneys implanted after >20 hr of CIT. Kidney grafts from donors older than 55 years had worse graft survival than grafts from donors younger than 55 (87% vs. 78% at 1 year and 80% vs. 58% at 5 years after transplant, P=0.0001). A CIT of >20 hr significantly reduced graft survival (91% vs.74.3% at 5 years after transplant, P=0.0002) in the young donor group and was associated with an overall graft survival in the old donor group of 57.5% at 5 years. In the same group, ignoring the HLA-DR mismatching to achieve shorter CIT, the predicted initial cost on graft survival at 1 year would have been 3.7% but would have increased to 9% 5 years after transplant. For young donors a CIT of >20 hr had a cost of approximately 18% at 5-year graft survival, far higher than a single DR mismatch. Occurrence of DGF decreased survival in both short (P=0.001) and long (P=0.00001) CIT groups.
CONCLUSION: Forming local alliances (common recipient lists) and minimizing delays within the hospital might reduce CIT and DGF while achieving excellent HLA matching. This should improve significantly the outcome of both old and young donor kidney grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11544430     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200108270-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  10 in total

Review 1.  Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sri G Yarlagadda; Steven G Coca; Amit X Garg; Mona Doshi; Emilio Poggio; Richard J Marcus; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Cold preservation with hyperbranched polyglycerol-based solution improves kidney functional recovery with less injury at reperfusion in rats.

Authors:  Shadan Li; Bin Liu; Qiunong Guan; Irina Chafeeva; Donald E Brooks; Christopher Yc Nguan; Jayachandran N Kizhakkedathu; Caigan Du
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Risk Factors for 1-Year Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Farid Foroutan; Erik Loewen Friesen; Kathryn Elizabeth Clark; Shahrzad Motaghi; Roman Zyla; Yung Lee; Rakhshan Kamran; Emir Ali; Mitch De Snoo; Ani Orchanian-Cheff; Christine Ribic; Darin J Treleaven; Gordon Guyatt; Maureen O Meade
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Is delayed graft function causally associated with long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation? Instrumental variable analysis.

Authors:  Neel M Butala; Peter P Reese; Mona D Doshi; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  ABCB1 genotypes predict cyclosporine-related adverse events and kidney allograft outcome.

Authors:  Dario Cattaneo; Piero Ruggenenti; Sara Baldelli; Nicola Motterlini; Eliana Gotti; Silvio Sandrini; Maurizio Salvadori; Giuseppe Segoloni; Paolo Rigotti; Donato Donati; Norberto Perico; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Enhanced significance of donor-recipient age gradient as a prognostic factor of graft outcome in living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Milljae Shin; Jae Berm Park; Choon Hyuck David Kwon; Jae-Won Joh; Suk-Koo Lee; Sung-Joo Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The Need for New Donor Stratification to Predict Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Shin Seok Yang; Jaeseok Yang; Curie Ahn; Sang Il Min; Jongwon Ha; Sung Joo Kim; Jae Berm Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Risk Balancing of Cold Ischemic Time against Night Shift Surgery Possibly Reduces Rates of Reoperation and Perioperative Graft Loss.

Authors:  Nikos Emmanouilidis; Julius Boeckler; Bastian P Ringe; Alexander Kaltenborn; Frank Lehner; Hans Friedrich Koch; Jürgen Klempnauer; Harald Schrem
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2017-01-19

Review 9.  Imaging technologies for monitoring the safety, efficacy and mechanisms of action of cell-based regenerative medicine therapies in models of kidney disease.

Authors:  Jack Sharkey; Lauren Scarfe; Ilaria Santeramo; Marta Garcia-Finana; Brian K Park; Harish Poptani; Bettina Wilm; Arthur Taylor; Patricia Murray
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.432

10.  What is the impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatching on graft survival and mortality in renal transplantation? A meta-analysis of 23 cohort studies involving 486,608 recipients.

Authors:  Xinmiao Shi; Jicheng Lv; Wenke Han; Xuhui Zhong; Xinfang Xie; Baige Su; Jie Ding
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.388

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.