Literature DB >> 11535483

Using conjoint analysis to assess patients' preferences when visiting emergency departments in Hong Kong.

G M Leung1, S S Chan, P Y Chau, S C Chua.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore factors related to emergency department (ED) attendances in Hong Kong, the authors piloted the application of conjoint analysis in eliciting patient preferences regarding ED visits.
METHODS: The study recruited 390 semi-urgent or non-urgent patients from a targeted convenience sample of three large EDs. Respondents were asked to rank eight scenarios structured to explore the relative importance of three key attributes-self-perceived illness severity, waiting time, and consultation fee-that may result in an ED visit.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of the respondents would consider visiting a parallel clinic instead of the ED for semi-urgent and non-urgent conditions. The relative importance attached to illness severity, waiting time, and consultation fee were 47.8%, 33.6%, and 18.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that Hong Kong patients are receptive to the concept of parallel clinics, and illustrated that conjoint analysis is a rigorous survey technique for eliciting the views of patients on health care services in the ED setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11535483     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01151.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  7 in total

1.  Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.

Authors:  Kuang-Yi Wen; David H Gustafson; Robert P Hawkins; Patricia F Brennan; Susan Dinauer; Pauley R Johnson; Tracy Siegler
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable.

Authors:  E Cross; S Goodacre; A O'Cathain; J Arnold
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Nonurgent Patients' Preferences for Emergency Department Versus General Practitioner and Effects of Incentives: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Yuliu Su; Shrutivandana Sharma; Semra Ozdemir; Wai Leng Chow; Hong-Choon Oh; Ling Tiah
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2021-07-09

4.  Race, treatment preferences, and hospice enrollment: eligibility criteria may exclude patients with the greatest needs for care.

Authors:  Jessica Fishman; Peter O'Dwyer; Hien L Lu; Hope R Henderson; Hope Henderson; David A Asch; David J Casarett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The Australian public's preferences for emergency care alternatives and the influence of the presenting context: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Paul Harris; Jennifer A Whitty; Elizabeth Kendall; Julie Ratcliffe; Andrew Wilson; Peter Littlejohns; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  How do patients value and prioritize patient portal functionalities and usage factors? A conjoint analysis study with chronically ill patients.

Authors:  Gaby Anne Wildenbos; Frank Horenberg; Monique Jaspers; Linda Peute; Danielle Sent
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Delays in service for non-emergent patients due to arrival of emergent patients in the emergency department: a case study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Mai Xu; Tse Chiu Wong; Shui Yee Wong; Kwai Sang Chin; Kwok Leung Tsui; Renee Y Hsia
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 1.484

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.