Literature DB >> 11528170

Proposal for a "European Scoring System for Laparoscopic Operations in Urology".

B Guillonneau1, C C Abbou, J D Doublet, R Gaston, G Janetschek, A Mandressi, J J Rassweiler, G Vallancien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To propose a scoring system of difficulties for the most currently performed laparoscopic procedures in urology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each current laparoscopic procedure has been evaluated according to three different criteria: technical difficulty, operative risk and the attention required. Each criterion is scored from 1 (minimal impact of the criteria) to 7 (maximal impact of the criteria). The sum of the 3 criteria is used to classify each operation according to an increasing level of global difficulty, classified into 6 levels: easy (E: sum of criteria between 3 and 5), slightly difficult (SD: sum of criteria between 6 and 8), fairly difficult (FD: sum of criteria between 9 and 11), difficult (D: sum of criteria between 12 and 14), very difficult (VD: sum of criteria between 15 and 17), extremely difficult (ED: sum of criteria greater than 18).
RESULTS: Procedures currently performed by laparoscopy have been selected for evaluation according to the above criteria, and retrospectively validated by European experts in laparoscopic urology according to their experience and the international literature.
CONCLUSION: This proposal of a scoring scale system is a basis for discussion, teaching and learning of urological laparoscopy. By necessity, this scale is evolving and will be regularly reconsidered and updated every 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11528170     DOI: 10.1159/000049742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  24 in total

1.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  H M Do; S Holze; H Qazi; A Dietel; T Häfner; E Liatsikos; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Risk factors for postoperative ileus after urologic laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Myung Joon Kim; Gyeong Eun Min; Koo Han Yoo; Sung-Goo Chang; Seung Hyun Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-06-09

3.  Intensive laparoscopic training: the impact of a simplified pelvic-trainer model for the urethrovesical anastomosis on the learning curve.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle De Vries; Wolfgang Dillenburg; Matthias Moeckel; Eduard Becht
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior mesh.

Authors:  P Xiromeritis; M L Marotta; N Royer; I Kalogiannidis; P Degeest; F Devos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitri Liapis; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard; Grégoire Robert; Laurence Bastien; Andras Hoznek; Dimitri Vordos; Claude Abbou; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Evaluation of the complications in transperitoneal laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery with Clavien-Dindo classification.

Authors:  Melih Balcı; Altuğ Tuncel; Özer Güzel; Yılmaz Aslan; Tanju Keten; Ersin Köseoğlu; Anıl Erkan; Ali Atan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-06

7.  Safe introduction of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in clinical practice: impact of a modular training program.

Authors:  Francesco Cantiello; Domenico Veneziano; Riccardo Bertolo; Antonio Cicione; Cristian Fiori; Riccardo Autorino; Rocco Damiano; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal simple nephrectomy: The impact of etiological factors of the results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Rauf Naghiyev; Sudeyf Imamverdiyev; Elchin Efendiyev; Öner Şanlı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  Evaluation of complications in endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in a modular training programme: a multicentre experience.

Authors:  Roman Ganzer; Robert Rabenalt; Michael C Truss; Stefanos Papadoukakis; Minh Do; Andreas Blana; Markus Straub; Stefan Denzinger; Wolf F Wieland; Martin Burchardt; Thomas Herrmann; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Robotic-assistance does not enhance standard laparoscopic technique for right-sided donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Xiaolong S Liu; Hadley W Narins; Warren R Maley; Adam M Frank; Costas D Lallas
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.